Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement in the early intrapartum period

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 129-133

  Chittacharoen, A ^a   Srijhantuik, K ^a   Suthutvoravut, S ^a   Herabutya, Y ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Fetal movement; Fetalwell being; Labor; Maternal perception; Vibroacoustic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS MOVEMENT; FETUS RISK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

EID: 0031081460     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(96)02797-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. [1] Trudinger BJ, Boylan P. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring: value of sound stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 265-267.
2. [2] Smith CV, Phelan JP, Paul RH, Broussard P. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing: a retrospective experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 567-568.
3. [3] Arulkumaran S, Anandakumar C, Wong YC, Ratnum SS. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 182-186.
4. [4] Westgren M, Almstrom H, Nyman M, Ulmsten U. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movements as a measure of fetal well-being. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 523-527.
5. [5] Nyman M, Arulkumaran S, Jacobsson J, Westgren M. Vibroacoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome. J Perinat Med 1992; 20: 267-274.
6. [6] Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnum SS. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 800-806.
7. [7] Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Nelson S, Roark M. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1986; 61: 615-619.
8. [8] Thacker SB. The efficacy of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 24-30.
9. [9] Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Paul RH et al. Fetal acoustic stimulation in early labor in patients screened with the admission test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 70-74.
10. [10] Sarno Jr AP, Ahn MO, Phelan JP, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation in the early intrapartum period as a predictor of subsequent fetal condition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 762-767.
11. [11] Gelman SR, Wood S, Spellacy WN, Abrams RM. Fetal movements in response to sound stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 484-485.
12. [12] Divon MY, Platt LD, Cantrell CJ, Smith CV, Yeh SY, Paul RH. Evoked fetal startle response: a possible intrauterine neurological examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 454-456.
13. [13] Inglis SR, Druzin ML, Wagner WE, Kogut E. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 371-374.
14. [14] Smith CV, Nguyen HN, Phelan JP, Pau RH. Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of fetal acoustic stimulation with acid-base determinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 726-728.
15. [15] Strong TH Jr, Jordan DL, Marden DW. The fetal recoil test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1382-1383.
16. [16] Ohel G, Horowitz E., Linder N, Sohmer H. Neonatal auditory acuity following inutero vibratory acoustic stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 440-441.
17. [17] Arulkumaran S, Skurr B, Tong H, Kek LP, Yeoh K, Ratnam SS. No evidence of hearing loss due to fetal acoustic stimulation test. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 283-285.