Midbroken reinforced concrete shear frames due to earthquakes. A hysteretic model to quantify damage at the storey level

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 95-112

  Köylüoǧlu, H Uǧur ^a   Çakmak, Ahmet Ş ^b   Nielsen, Søren R K ^c  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Damage; Hysteretic models; Local damage indices; Midbroken structures; Reinforced concrete shear frames

Indexed keywords

DETERIORATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION; HYSTERETIC MODEL; MIDBROKEN STRUCTURES; SHEAR FRAMES;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

CONCRETE FRAME; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; HYSTERETIC MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 0031080548     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(96)00038-3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DiPasquale, E. & Çakmak, A. Ş. Detection of seismic structural damage using parameter-based global damage indices. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 5, 60-65.
2. Çeçen, H. Response of ten storey, reinforced concrete model frames to simulated earthquakes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 1979.
3. Healey, T. J. & Sözen, M. A. Experimental study of the dynamic response of a ten storey reinforced concrete with a tail first storey. Report No. UILU-ENG-78-2012, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 1978.
4. Nielsen, S. R. K., Köylüoǧlu, H. U. & Çakmak, A. Ş. One and two dimensional maximum softening damage indicators for reinforced concrete structures under seismic excitation. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Engng, 1993, 11, 435-43.
5. Nielsen, S. R. K. & Çakmak, A. Ş. Evaluation of maximum softening as a damage indicator for reinforced concrete under seismic excitation. Proc. First Int. Conf. on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, ed. Spanos and Brebbia, 1992, pp. 169-84.
6. Köylüoǧlu, H. U., Nielsen, S. R. K. & Çakmak, A. Ş. Prediction of global and localized damage and future reliability for RC structures subject to earthquakes. University of Aalborg, Structural Reliability Theory Paper No. 128, ISSN 0902-7513 R9426. Earthq. Engng Struct. Dynam., 1994.
7. Clough, W. & Johnston, S. B. Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. Proc. 2nd Japan Earthquake Symposium, 1966, pp. 227-32.
8. Köylüoǧlu, H. U., Nielsen, S. R. K. & Çakmak, A. Ş. Local and modal damage indicators for reinforced concrete shear frames subject to earthquakes. University of Aalborg, Structural Reliability Theory Paper No. 145, ISSN 0902-7513 R9521. J. Engng Mech., ASCE, 1995, to be published.
9. Hassiotis, S. & Jeong, G. D. Assessment of structural damage from natural frequency measurements. Comput. Struct., 1993, 49, 679-91.
10. Hajela, P. & Soeiro, A. V. Structural damage detection based on static and modal analysis. AIAA J., 1990, 28, 1110-15.
11. Rahman, S. & Grigoriu, M. Local and models for non-linear dynamic analysis of multi-storey shear buildings subject to earthquakes. Comput. Struct., 1994, 53, 739-54.
12. Minai, R. & Suzuki, Y. Seismic reliability analysis of building structures. Proc. ROC-Japan joint seminar on Multiple Hazards Mitigation, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, ROC, March 1985, pp. 193-207.
13. Shinozuka, M. & Deodatis, G. Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Appl. Mech. Reviews, 1991, 40, 191-204.