Program-level curriculum planning: An exploration of faculty perspectives on two different campuses

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 99-130

  Stark, Joan S ^a,b   Lowther, Malcolm A ^a   Sharp, Sally ^a   Arnold, Gertrude L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b 1323 School of Education Building   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031073209     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024952829701     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angelo, Thomas A., and Cross, K. Patricia (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bean, John P., and Kuh, George D. (1984). A typology of planning problems. Journal of Higher Education 55(1): 35-55.
3. Becher, Tony (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Bristol, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.
4. Biglan, Anthony (1973a, June). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57:195-203.
5. Biglan, Anthony (1973b, June). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 204-213.
6. Conrad, Clifton F., and Pratt, Anne M. (1983). Making decisions about the curriculum: From metaphor to model. Journal of Higher Education 54(1): 16-30.
7. Conrad, Clifton F., and Wilson, Richard. F. (1985). Academic Program Reviews: Institutional Approaches, Expectations, and Controversies. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
8. Cope, Robert (1987). Opportunity from Strength: Strategic Planning Clarified with Case Examples. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
9. Creswell, J. W., and Roskens, R. W. (1981). The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas. Review of Higher Education 4(3): 1-16.
10. Davis, J., and Young, R. E. (1982). Faculty Development Programs in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. University of North Dakota Office of Instructional Development. Minneapolis, MN: Bush Foundation.
11. Donald, Janet G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education 54: 31-41.
12. Donald, Janet G. (1990). University professors' views of knowledge and validation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2): 242-249.
13. Donald, Janet G. (1992). The development of thinking processes in postsecondary education: Application of a working model. Higher Education 24: 413-430.
14. Drees, Lauren Allen (1982). The Biglan Model: An Augmentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.
15. Friedmann, John (1967). A conceptual model for the analysis of planning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 225-252.
16. Halliburton, David (1977a). Perspectives on the curriculum. In A. W. Chickering, D. Halliburton, W. H. Bergquist, and J. Lindquist (eds.), Developing the College Curriculum (pp. 37-50). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
17. Halliburton, David (1977b). Designing curriculum. In A. W. Chickering, D. Halliburton, W. H. Bergquist, and J. Lindquist (eds.), Developing the College Curriculum (pp. 51-74.). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
18. Heydinger, Richard (1980). Introduction: Academic program planning in perspective. In Richard Heydinger (ed.), Academic Planning for the 1980s. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Julia, John J. (1994). Unpublished Comprehensive Qualifying Examination, The University of Michigan.
20. Kinnick, Mary K. (1995, Spring). What does an academic department chairperson need to know anyway? Tallahassee: AIR Professional File No. 56.
21. Lattuca, Lisa R., and Stark, Joan S. (1994). Will disciplinary perspectives impede curriculum reform? Journal of Higher Education 65(4): 401-426.
22. Lindquist, Jack (1974). Political linkage: The academic innovation process. Journal of Higher Education 45(5): 323-343.
23. Lindquist, Jack (1978). Strategies for Change. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Soundings Press.
24. Lowther, Malcolm A., and Stark, Joan S. (1990, April). Course Planning Patterns of College Teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
25. Massy, William F., Wilger, Andrea K., and Colbeck, Carol (1994, July/August). Departmental cultures and teaching quality: Overcoming "hollowed" collegiality. Change 26(4): 10-20.
26. National Institute of Education (1984, October). Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education. Report of the NIE Study Group on the Condition of Excellence in American Higher Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Ratcliff, James L. (1992). What we can learn from coursework patterns about improving the undergraduate curriculum. In J. L. Ratcliff (ed.), Assessment and Curriculum Reform. New Directions for Higher Education No. 80, pp. 5-22. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Richardson, Richard C., Jr., and Gardner, Don E. (1983). Avoiding extremes on the planning continuum. Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 180-192.
29. Seymour, Daniel T. (1988). Developing Academic Programs: The Climate for Innovation. ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report No. 3. Washington, DC: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education and the Association for the Study of Higher Education.
30. Seymour, Daniel T. (1991, November). TQM on campus: What the pioneers are finding. AAHE Bulletin 44(3): 11-13.
31. Seymour, Daniel T. (1993). On Q: Causing Quality in Higher Education. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
32. Stark, Joan S., and Lattuca, Lisa R. (1993). Diversity among disciplines: The same goal for all? In Carol G. Schneider and William S. Green (eds.), Strengthening the College Major. New Directions for Higher Education No. 84, pp. 71-86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Stark, Joan S., and Lattuca, Lisa R. (1997). Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Action. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
34. Stark, Joan S., and Lowther, Malcolm A. (1988). Perspectives on course and program planning. In J. S. Stark and L. Mets (eds.), Improving Teaching and Learning Through Research. New Directions for Institutional Research No. 57, pp. 39-52. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Stark, Joan S., Lowther, Malcolm A., Bentley, Richard J., and Martens, Gretchen G. (1990). Disciplinary differences in course planning. Review of Higher Education 13(2): 141-165.
36. Stark, Joan S., Lowther, Malcolm A., Bentley, Richard J., Ryan, Michael P., Martens, Gretchen G., Genthon, Michele L., Wren, Patricia A., and Shaw, Kathleen M. (1990). Planning Introductory College Courses: Influences on Faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
37. Stark, Joan S., Lowther, Malcolm A., Ryan, Michael P., Bomotti, Sally Smith, Genthon, Michele L., Haven, C. Lynne, and Martens Gretchen. G. (1998). Reflections on Course Planning: Faculty and Students Consider Influences and Goals. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
38. Stoecker, J. L. (1993). The Biglan classification revisited. Review of Higher Education 34(4): 451-464.
39. Toombs, William, and Tierney William G. (1991). Meeting the Mandate: Renewing the College and Departmental Curriculum. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
40. Zemsky, Robert (1989). Structure and Coherence: Measuring the Undergraduate Curriculum. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.