Mobile Manipulator Motion Planning for Multiple Tasks Using Global Optimization Approach

Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 169-190

  Lee, Jae Kyung ^a   Cho, Hyung Suck ^b  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Commutation configuration; Global optimization; Mobile manipulator; Motion planning; Multiple task; Non holonomic constraint; Redundancy introduced by mobility

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; END EFFECTORS; MANIPULATORS; OPTIMIZATION; REDUNDANCY; TRACKING (POSITION);

COMMUTATION CONFIGURATION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; MOBILE MANIPULATOR; MULTIPLE TASK; NON HOLONOMIC CONSTRAINT;

MOTION PLANNING;

EID: 0031069277     PISSN: 09210296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007939823675     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pin, Francois G. and Culioli, J.-C.: Optimal positioning of combined mobile platform-manipulator systems for material handling tasks, J. Intelligent and Robotic Systems 6 (1992), 165-182.
2. Pin, Francois G., Culioli, J.-C., and Reister, D. B.: Using minimax approaches to plan optimal task commutation configurations for combined mobile platform-manipulator systems, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 10(1) (1994), 44-45.
3. Yamamoto, Y. and Yun, X.: Coordinating locomotion and manipulation of a mobile manipulator, in: Proc. 31st IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Tucson (1992), pp. 2643-2648.
4. Yamamoto, Y. and Yun, X.: Coordinated obstacle avoidance of a mobile manipulator, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya (1995), pp. 2255-2260.
5. Seraji, H.: An on-line approach to coordinated mobility and manipulation, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta (1993), pp. 28-35.
6. Seraji, H.: Configuration control of rover-mounted manipulators, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya (1995), pp. 2261-2266.
7. Carriker, W. F., Khosla, P. K., and Krogh, B. H.: The use of simulated annealing to solve the mobile manipulator path planning problem, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati (1990), pp. 204-209.
8. Carriker, W. F., Khosla, P. K., and Krogh, B. H.: Path planning for mobile manipulators for multiple task execution, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 7(3) (1991), 403-408.
9. Zhao, M., Ansari, N., and Hou, E. S. H.: Mobile manipulator path planning by a genetic algorithm, J. Robotic Systems 11(3) (1994), 143-153.
10. Su, C. and Zheng, Y. F.: Task decomposition for a multilimbed robot to work in reachable but unorientable space, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 7(6) (1991), 759-770.
11. Lee, J. K. and Cho, H. S.: A coordinated motion control method for mobile manipulators, in: Proc. of ISMCR'95, Smolenice (1995), pp. 441-446.
12. Khatib, O.: Real time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, Int. J. Robotics Res. 5(1) (1986), 90-98.
13. Volpe, R. and Khosla, P.: Manipulator control with superquadratic artificial potential function: Theory and experiments, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 20(6) (1990), 1423-1436.
14. Koren, Y. and Borenstein, J.: Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics Automation, Sacramento (1991), pp. 1398-1404.
15. De Luca, A. and Oriolo, G.: Local incremental planning for nonholonomic mobile robots, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego (1994), pp. 104-110.
16. Jagannathan, S., Zhu, S. Q., and Lewis F. L.: Path planning and control of mobile base with nonholonomic constraints, Robotica 12 (1994), 529-539.
17. Barraquand, J. and Latombe, J. C., On nonholonomic mobile robots and optimal maneuvering, in: Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Symp. Intelligent Control (1989), pp. 340-347.
18. Nakamura, Y.: Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization, Addison-Wesley, 1991.
19. Yoshikawa, T.: Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy, in: Brady, M. and Paul, R. P. (eds), 1st Int'l Symp., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1984), pp. 735-748.
20. Liegeois, A.: Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behaviour of multibody mechanisms, IEEE Trans. System, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-7(12) (1977), 868-871.
21. Chang, P. H.: A Closed form solution for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators with redundancy, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation RA-3(5) (1987), 393-403.
22. Martin, D. P., Baillieul, J., and Hollerbach, J. M.: Resolution of kinematic redundancy using optimization technique, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation RA-5(4) (1989), 529-533.
23. Suh, K. C. and Hollerbach, J. M.: Local versus global torque optimization of redundant manipulators, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Raleigh (1987), pp. 619-624.
24. Colbaugh, R., Seraji, H., and Glass, K. L.: Obstacle avoidance for redundant robots using configuration control, J. Robotic Systems 6 (1989), 721-744.
25. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukosky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T.: Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988.
26. Levy, A. V. and Gomez, S.: The tunneling method applied to global optimization, in: Numerical Optimization, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (1984), pp. 213-244.