The process of explanation

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-5

  Krull, Douglas S ^a   Anderson, Craig A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031068980     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512447     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, C.A., Krull, D.S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271-296). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Anderson, C.A., & Slusher, M.P. (1986). Relocating motivational effects: An examination of the cognition-motivation debate on attributions for success and failure. Social Cognition, 4, 270-292.
3. Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J.S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Bargh, J.A. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169-183). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Higgins, E.T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-123). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychology Review, 94, 211-228.
7. Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Manis, M., Nelson, T.E., & Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28-36.
9. Martin, L.L., Seta, J.J., & Crelia, R.A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
10. McArthur, L.Z., & Baron, R. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
11. Ostrom, T.M. (1984). The sovereignty of social cognition. In R.S. Wyer, Jr., & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519-557.
13. Postman, L., & Brown, D.R. (1952). The perceptual consequences of success and failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 213-221.
14. Read, S.J., & Miller, L.C. (1993). Rapist or "regular guy": Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 526-540.
15. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Sagar, H.A., & Schofield, J.W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598.
17. Snyder, M., & Swann, W.B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
18. Taylor, S.E., & Fiske, S.T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
19. White, P.A. (1988). Causal processing: Origins and development. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 36-52.
20. Zebrowitz, L.A. (1990). Social perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.