Spontaneous recovery from the effect of relative stimulus validity

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-19

  Cole, Robert P ^b   Gunther, Lisa M ^b   Miller, Ralph R ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031066395     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/lmot.1997.0949     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Balaz, M. A., Gustin, P., Cacheiro, H., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 99-113.
2. Brown, T. (1920). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind (Vois. 1 and 2). Edinburgh: James Ballantyne.
3. Cole, R. P., Barnet, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (1995). Relative validity effect: Learning or performance deficit? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 293-303.
4. Cole, R. P., Denniston, J. C., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Reminder-induced attenuation of the effect of relative stimulus validity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 256-265.
5. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory. Leipzig Duncker, H. A. Ruger, and C. E. Bussenius (Eds.): New York: Teachers College, Columbia Univ. [translated 1913]
6. Gibbon, J., & Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locutro, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219-253). New York: Academic Press.
7. Holland, P. C. & Block, H. (1983). Evidence for a unique cue in positive patterning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 297-300.
8. Hull, C. L. (1945). Discrimination of stimulus configuration and the hypothesis of afferent neural interaction. Psychological Review, 52, 133-142.
9. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42-64). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie Univ. Press.
10. Kasprow, W.J., Cacheiro, H., Balaz, M. A., & Miller, R. R. (1982). Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 13, 155-166.
11. Kaufman, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318-320.
12. Kraemer, P. J. Lariviere, N. A., & Spear, N. E. (1988). Expression of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound: Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases over a retention interval in adults. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 164-168.
13. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-289.
14. Matzel, L. D. Held, F. P., & Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory. Learning and Motivation, 19, 317-344.
15. Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., & Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 16, 398-412.
16. McAllister, W. R. & McAllister, D. E., (1963). Increase over time in the stimulus generalization of acquired fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 576-582.
17. Miller, J. S. Jagielo, J. A., & Spear, N. E. (1993). The influence of retention interval on the US preexposure effect: Changes in contextual blocking over time. Learning and Motivation, 24, 376-394.
18. Miller, R. R., & Barnet, R. C. (1993). The role of time in elementary associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 106-111.
19. Miller, R. R. & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
22. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 6, 532-552.
23. Perkins, C. C. Jr., & Weyant, R. G. (1958). The interval between training and test trials as determiner of the slope of generalization gradients. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 596-600.
24. Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1-5.
25. Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26. Riccio, D. C. Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
27. Thomas, D. A. & Riccio, D. C. (1979). Forgetting of a CS attribute in a conditioned suppression paradigm. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 191-195.
28. Wagner, A. R. (1969a). Stimulus-selection and a "modified contiguity theory." In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 1-41). New York: Academic Press.
29. Wagner, A. R. (1969b). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honing (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 90-122). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie Univ. Press.
30. Wagner, A. R. Logan, F. A. Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
31. Wasserman, E. A. (1974). Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 284-297.