Regionalization of neonatal care in France (exclusive of Paris). An approach through an analysis of transfer policies of very low birth weight infants;Contribution a l'etude de la prise en charge des grands prematures en France metropolitaine (a l'exception de l'Ile-de-France)

Archives de Pediatrie

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 121-125

  Racoussot, S ^a   Truffert, P ^a   Klosowski, S ^a   Lequien, P ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

data collection; infant, premature

Indexed keywords

SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; GENERAL HOSPITAL; INCUBATOR; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PREMATURITY; STATISTICS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FRANCE; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INCUBATORS, INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; PATIENT TRANSFER;

EID: 0031064621     PISSN: 0929693X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0929-693X(97)86152-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Haut-Comité de la Santé publique. La sécurité et la qualité de la grossesse et de la naissance: pour un nouveau plan de périnatalué. Rennes: ENSP, 1994
2. Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy; White Plains, NY: The national Foundation - March of Dimes; 1976
3. Lucey JF. Why we should regionalize perinatal care. Pediatrics 1973;52:438-91
4. Paneth N. Kiely JL, Wallenstein S. Marcus M. Pakter J, Susser M. Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study. N Engl J Med 1982;307:149-55
5. Gortmaker S, Sobol A, Clark C, Walker DK, Geronimus A. The survival of very-low-birth-weight infants by level of hospital at birth: a population based study of perinatal systems in four states Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985:152; 517-24
6. Cooke RWI. Referral to a regional center improves outcome in extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child 1987;62:619-21
7. Kollée LA, Brand R. Schleuder AM, Ens-Kokkum MH. Veen S, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Five-year outcome of preterm and very tow birth weight infants; a comparison between maternal and neonatal transport. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:635-8
8. Papiernik E. Régionalisation des soins périnatal. In: Papiernik E, Cabrol D, Pons JC, éds. Obstétrique. Paris: Flammarion. Médecine-Sciences, 1995:1557-67
9. Kanto WP Jr. Regionalizaiion revisited. Am J Dis Child 1987;141:403-4
10. Papiernik E. Keith LG. The regionalization of perinatal care in France. Description of a missing policy Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;61:99-103
11. Dehan M, Vodovar M. Goujard J. Devenir des prématurés de moins de 33 semaines d'âge conceptionel: résultats d'une enquête menée en 1985 das la région parisienne. J Gynécol Obstet Biol Reprod 1990;1925-35
12. Keirse MJNC. Preterm delivery. In: Chalmers I. Enkin M. Keirse MJNC, eds. Effective cart in pregnancy and childbirth. vol 2 Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989:1270-86
13. Mayfield JA, Rosenblatt RA, Baldwin LM, Chu J, Logerfo JP. The relation of obstetrical volume and nursery level to perinatal mortality. Am J Public Health 1990;80:819-23
14. Ozminkowski RJ, Wonman PM, Roloff DW. "Inborn"/ "outborn" status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non randomized studies. Stat Med 1988;7:1207-21
15. Harding JE, Morton SM. Adverse effects of neonatal transport between level III centres. J Paediatr Child Health 1993:29:146-9
16. Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verwey RA, Ebeling MCA, Brand R. Ruys JH. Mortality in very preterm and very low birth weight infants according to place of birth and level of care: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in the Netherlands. Pediatrics 1988;81:404-11
17. Richardson DK, Reed K, Cutler JC et al. Perinatal regionalization versus hospital competitors the Hartford example. Pediatrics 1995;96:417-23