|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-75
|
Is the patient's right to die evolving into a duty to die?: Medical decision making and ethical evaluations in health care
a,c a b |
Author keywords
Doctor patient relationship; Duty to die; Futility; Medical ethics; Medical responsibility; Societal needs
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
CONFLICT;
COST CONTROL;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
ETHICS;
GROUP PROCESS;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HUMAN;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
COST CONTROL;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
UNITED STATES;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0031063833
PISSN: 13561294
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1997.tb00069.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (7)
|