Surface treatment effects on amalgam repair strength

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 9-14

  Dlefenderfer, Kim E ^a   Reinhardt, John W ^b   Brown, Shelton B ^c  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c St Anthony Hospital Oklahoma City   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCE CEMENT; ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; ALUMINUM OXIDE; AMALGAMBOND; DENTAL ALLOY; FUJIPLUS; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESINOMER; TOOTH CEMENT; TYTIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL BONDING; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL POLISHING; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0031061452     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arenholt-Bindslev D. Dental amalgam. Environmental aspects. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 125-130.
2. Levy M. Dental amalgam: Toxicological evaluation and health risk assessment. J Can Dent Assoc 1995; 61: 667-674.
3. Eley BM, Cox SW. The release, absorption and possible health effects of mercury from dental amalgam: A review of recent findings. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 355-362.
4. Lorscheider FL, Vimy MJ, Summers AO. Mercury exposure from "silver" tooth fillings: Emerging evidence questions a traditional dental paradigm. FASEB J 1995; 9: 504-508.
5. Paterson FM, Paterson RC, Watts A, et al. Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1995; 23: 137-143.
6. Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Caldeira de Andrada MA. Amalgam repair: A case report. Quint Int 1992; 23: 527-531.
7. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 355-359.
8. Ishijima T, Caputo AA, Mito R. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 445-449.
9. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER, et al. The influence of an adhesive system on shear bond strength of repaired high-copper amalgams. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 175-180.
10. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Czech D, el al. Tensile bond strength of repaired amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 313-317.
11. Roeder LB, DeSchepper EJ, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of repaired amalgam with adhesive bonding systems. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 126-128.
12. Lacy AM, Rupprecht R, Watanabe L. Use of self-curing composite resins to facilitate amalgam repair. Quint Int 1992; 23: 53-59.
13. Sneesby TA, Meiers JC. Influence of saliva contamination and abrasion on resin to tin-plated alloy bond strengths. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 100-105.
14. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 43-46.
15. Hibler JA, Foor JL, Miranda FJ, et al. Bond strength comparisons of repaired dental amalgams. Quint Int 1988;19: 411-415.
16. Reinhardt JW, Chan KC, Schulein TM. Mercury vaporization during amalgam removal. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 62-64.
17. Jorgenson KD, Saito T. Bond strength of repaired amalgam. Acta Odontol Scand 1960; 26: 605-615.
18. Cowan RD. Amalgam repair. A clinical technique. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 49-51.
19. Terkla LG, Mahler DB, Mitchem JC. Bond strength of repaired amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 942-947.
20. Erkes EO, Burgess TO, Hornheck DD. Amalgam repair: An in vitro evaluation of bond integrity. Gen Dent 1990; 6: 203-205.
21. Walker AC, Jr., Reese SB. Bond strength of amalgam to amalgam in a high-copper amalgam. Oper Dent 1983; 8: 99-102.
22. Hasegawa T, Relief DH, Russell CM, et al. A laboratory study of the Amalgambond adhesive system. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 181-186.