Effect of fit adjustment on CEREC CAD-CAM veneers

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 46-51

  White, Shane N ^a,b   Suh, Peter S ^b   Yu, Zhaokun ^a   Johnson, Ronald ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Dept Restorative Dent/Biomaterials ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CEREC; HELIOBOND; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL VENEERS; EVALUATION STUDIES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PROSTHESIS FITTING; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0031061329     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Duret F, Blouin J-L, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-720.
2. Mormann W, Brandestini M. Verfahren zur herstellung medizinischer und zahntechnischer alloplastischer, endo und exoprothethischer passkoerper. European Patent EP-A-00 54 785, 1985.
3. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: A CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:703-707.
4. Calamia JR. Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers. Am J Dent 1989;2:9-15.
5. Karlsson S, Landahl I, Stegersjo G, et al A clinical evaluation of ceramic laminate veneers. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5;447-451.
6. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers Br Dent J 1993;175:317-321.
7. Walls AWG. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical results after 5 years of follow-up. Br Dent J 1995;178:337-340.
8. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Valenti G, et al. Porcelain CAD-CAM veneers some new uses explored. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:63-67.
9. Essig ME, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF, et al. In vitro evaluation of CEREC veneer utilizing standardized preparation template. International symposium on Computer Restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1991; 547-552.
10. Liu P-R, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder. Evaluating CAD-CAM generated ceramic veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:59-63.
11. Suh PS, Johnson R, White SN. Fit of porcelain veneers made by CAD-CAM and platinum foil methods. Oper Dent In press.
12. Sturdevant JR, Heyman HO, Wilder AD, et al. Composite cement thickness of CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1991;70: 296 (Abstr 245).
13. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeck B, Willems G, et al. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171-177.
14. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-46.
15. Hembree J H Jr. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces. Quint Int 1995;26:145-147.
16. Certification programs of the Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment, American Dental Association Specification #s 8, 6, 66, 1987.
17. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:476-481.
18. Harasani MH, Isidor F, Kaaber S. Marginal fit of porcelain and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vitro conditions. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:262-268.
19. Sorensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, et al. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:16-22.
20. Wall JG, Reisbeck MH, Espeleta KG. Cement luting thickness beneath porcelain veneers made on platinum foil. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:448-450.
21. Yu Z, Strutz JM, Kipnis V, et al. Effect of dynamic loading methods on cement film thickness in vitro. J Prosthod 1995;4:251-256.
22. Davis SH, Kelly JR, Campbell SD. Use of an elastomeric material to improve the occlusal seat and marginal seal of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:288-291.
23. Millstein PL. A method to determine occlusal contact and noncontact areas: Preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:106-110.
24. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK. Improved seating of cast restorations using a silicone disclosing medium. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:323-326.
25. White SN Kipnis V. The three-dimensional effects of adjustment and cementation on crown seating. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:248-254.
26. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vitro technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111.
27. Walker PM. Remounting multiple castings prior to final cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:357.
28. Coyne BMCA, Wilson NHF. A clinical evaluation of the marginal adaptation of porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1994;3:87-90.
29. Tay WM, Lynch E, Auger D. Effects of some finishing techniques on cervical margins of porcelain laminates. Quint Int 1987;18:559-602.