Insect predation on pike fry

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 366-370

  Le Louarn, H ^a   Cloarec, A ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

Esox lucius; insect predators; vulnerability

Indexed keywords

FISH JUVENILE; INSECT PREDATOR; PREDATION;

AESHNIDAE; ANAX IMPERATOR; COENAGRIONIDAE; COLEOPTERA; DYTISCIDAE; DYTISCUS MARGINALIS; ERYTHROMMA NAJAS; ESOX LUCIUS; HETEROPTERA; ILYOCORIS CIMICOIDES; LIBELLULA DEPRESSA; LIBELLULIDAE; NAUCORIDAE; NOTONECTA GLAUCA; NOTONECTIDAE; ODONATA;

EID: 0031060896     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jfbi.1996.0300     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams S. M., DeAngelis D. L. Indirect effects of early bass-shad interactions on predator population structure and food web dynamics. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. 1987;University Press of New England, Hanover.
2. Balvay G. L'alimentation naturelle des alevins de brochet (Esox lucius. Billard R. Le Brochet, Gestation dans le Milieu Naturel et Élevage. 1983;INRA, Paris.
3. Blois C. The larval diet of three anisopteran species. Freshwater Biology. 15:1985;505-514.
4. Caldwell J. P., Thorp J. H., Jervey T. O. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders and frogs. Oecologia. 46:1980;285-289.
5. Cloarec A. Alimentation des larves d'Anax imperator. Odonatologica. 6:1977;227-243.
6. Cloarec A. Factors influencing the choice of predatory tactics in a water bug,Diplonychus indicus. Animal Behaviour. 40:1990;262-271.
7. Colton T. Extending functional response models to include a second prey type: an experimental test. Ecology. 68:1987;900-912.
8. Corbet P. S. The life history of the emperor dragonflyAnax imperator. Journal of Animal Ecology. 26:1957;1-69.
9. Formanowicz Jr D. R. Foraging tactics of larvae ofDytiscus verticalis. Journal of Animal Ecology. 51:1982;757-767.
10. Juliano S. A., Lawton J. H. Extrinsic vs intrinsic food shortage and the strength of feeding links: effects of density and food availability on feeding rate ofHyphydrus ovatus. Oecologia. 83:1990;535-540.
11. Le Louarn, H. 1983, Production de brochet. Amélioration de la production naturelle au repeuplement, Le Brochet, Gestation dans le Milieu Naturel et Élevage, Billard, R. INRA, Paris.
12. Manelphe, J. 1989, Reproduction naturalle aménagée du brochet (Esox lucius, INP, Toulouse.
13. McCormick S., Polis G. A. Arthropods that prey on vertebrates. Biological Review. 57:1982;29-58.
14. Monjean J. R. Croissance du brochet commun,Esox lucius. 1960;D.E.S. Thèse, Montreal.
15. Murdoch W. W., Scott M. A., Ebsworth P. Effects of the general predator,Notonecta. Journal of Animal Ecology. 53:1984;791-808.
16. Peterson I., Wroblewski J. S. Mortality rate of fishes in the pelagic ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 41:1984;1117-1120.
17. Power M. E. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. Kerfoot W. C., Sih A. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. 1987;University Press of New England, Hanover.
18. Souchon Y. La reproduction du brochet (Esox lucius. Billard R. Le Brochet, Gestation dans le Milieu Naturel et Elevage. 1983;INRA, Paris.
19. Streams F. A. Foraging behavior in a notonectid assemblage. American Midland Naturalist. 117:1987;353-361.
20. Wright R. M., Giles N. The survival, growth and diet of pike fry,Esox lucius. Journal of Fish Biology. 30:1987;617-631.