Overall maturity of object relations as assessed by the McGill object relations scale

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 44-72

  Dymetryszyn, Hélène ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EGO; HUMAN; LIBIDO; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBJECT RELATION; OEDIPUS COMPLEX; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOSEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TRANSFERENCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0031057482     PISSN: 00259284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abraham, K. (1953). A short history of the development of the libido. In Selected papers (pp. 418-501). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1924)
2. Azim, H. F. A., Piper, W. E., Segal, P. M., Nixon, G. W. H., & Duncan, S.C. (1991). The Quality of Object Relations Scale. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 55, 323-343.
3. Bellak, L., Hurvich, M., &: Gediman, H. K. (1973). Ego functions in schizophrenics,nenrotics, and normals. New York: Wiley.
4. Bienvenu, J. P., de Carufel, R., Debbané, E., Lamoureux, P., Gaston, L., &: Szkrumelac, N. (1990). The McGill Object Relations Scale (MORS), 1st version. Unpublished manuscript.
5. Blatt, S. J., Brenneis, C, Schimek, J., & Click, M. (1976). Normal and psychopathological impairment of the concept of the object on the Rorschach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 364-373.
6. Bond, M. (1986). An empirical study of (AV) defense styles. In G.E. Vaillant (Ed.), Empirical studies of ego mechanisms of defense, (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
7. Bond, M. (1990). Are "borderline defenses" specific to borderline personality disorders? Journal of Personality Disorder, 4, 251-256.
8. Bond, M., Gardner, S. T., Christian, J., & Sigal, J. J. (1983). Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 333-338.
9. Bond, M., Paris,]., Se Zweig-Frank, H. (1994). Defense styles and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, S/28-31.
10. Bond, M., Se Vaillant, J. S. (1986). An empirical study of the relationship between diagnosis and defense style. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 285-288.
11. Buckley, P. (Ed). (1986). Essential papers on object relations. New York: New York University Press.
12. de Carufel, F. L., & Piper, W. E. (1988). Group psychotherapy or individual psychotherapy: Patient characteristics as predictive factors. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38, 169-188.
13. Diamond, D., Kaslow, N., Coonerty, S., &c Blatt, S. J. (1990). Changes in separation-individuation and intersubjectivity in long-term treatment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 363-397.
14. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring the overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
15. Fenichel, O. (1945). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton.
16. Fowler, C., Hilsenroth, M. J., Handler, L. (1995). Early memories: An exploration of theoretically derived queries and their clinical utility. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 59, 79-98.
17. Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 125-243). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1905)
18. Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works ofSigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 3-66).
19. London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1923)
20. Friedman, L. (1988). The clinical popularity of object relations concepts. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57, 667-691.
21. Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). The inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
23. Horowitz, M. J., Marmar, C., Weiss, D. S., DeWitt, K. N., & Rosenbaum, R. (1984). Brief psychotherapy of bereavement reactions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 438-448.
24. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
25. Kaltreider, N. B., DeWitt, K. N., Weiss, D. S., & Horowitz, M. J. (1981). Patterns of individual change scales. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 1263-1269.
26. Kantrowitz, J. L., Katz, A. L., Paolirto, F., Sashin, J., & Solomon, L. (1987). Changes in the level and quality of object relations in psychoanalysis: Follow-up of a longitudinal prospective study, journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 35, 23-46.
27. Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorder: Psychothérapeute strategies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Kernberg, O. F. (1992). Aggression in personality disorders and perversions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Krohn, A., & Mayman, M. (1974). Object representations in dreams and projective tests. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 38, 445-466.
30. Luborsky, L., &C Spence, D. (1978). Quantitative research on psychoanalytic therapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (rev. éd., pp. 331-368). New York: Wiley.
31. May, P. R. A., & Dixon, W. J. (1969). The Camarillo Dynamic Assessment Scales. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 33, 1-35.
32. McCullough, L. (1993). Standard and individualized psychotherapy outcome measures: A core battery. In N. E. Miller, L. Luborsky, J. P. Barber, & J. Docherty (Eds.). Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 469-496). New York: BasicBooks.
33. Millon, T. (1987). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual (3rd ed.).
34. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems. Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., & Stegner, B. L. (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6, 299-314.
35. Piper, W. E., Azim, H. F., Joyce, A. S., McCallum, M., Nixon, G. W., & Segal, P. S. (1991). Quality of object relations vs interpersonal functioning as predictors of therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy outcome. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 432-438.
36. Piper, W. E., de Carufel, F. L., & Szkrumelak, N. (1985). Patient predictors of process and outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 726-733.
37. Ryan, E. R., & Bell, M. D. (1984). Changes in object relations from psychosis to recovery. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 209-215.
38. Sandler, J., & Rosenblatt, B. (1962). The concept of the representational world. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 17, 128-145.
39. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
40. Smith, T. E. (1993). Measurement of object relations. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 2, 19-37.
41. Stone, L. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 567-594.
42. Urist, J. ( 1977). The Rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 3-9.
43. Vaillant, G. E. (1971). Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 107-118.
44. Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Psychoanalysis as a science: A response to the new challenges. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55, 414-451.
45. Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment, 2, 355-364.