Consistency of a double papnet scan of cervical smears

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 82-87

  Jenny, Jacques ^a,b   Isenegger, Irene ^a,c   Boon, Mathilde E ^a,d   Husain, O A Nasseem ^a,e  

^a MD FIAC   (Switzerland)

^b laboratory of Gynecologic Cytology   (Switzerland)

^c Institute of Pathology of Dr Med Gottfried Locher   (Switzerland)

^d LEIDEN CYTOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY LABORATORY   (Netherlands)

^e CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical smears; Image analysis, computer assisted; Mass screening; PAPNET

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0031056001     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000332310     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Asfaq R, Liang Y: Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1993;37:778
2. Attwood ME, Woodman CBJ, Luesley D, Jordan JA: Previous cytology in patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol 1985;29:108-110
3. Boon MF, Kok LP: Neural network processing can provide means to catch errors that slip through human screening of Pap smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:411-416
4. Boon MF, Kok LP, Nygaard-Nielsen M, Holm K, Holund B: Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficacy: A study of 63 false negative smears. Mod Pathol 1994;7:957-961
5. Bosch MMC, Rietveld-Scheffers PEM, Boon ME: Characteristics of false negative smears in the normal screening situation. Acta Cytol 1992;36:711-716
6. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goeliner JR: False-negative results in cervical studies. Acta Cytol 1985;29:1043-1046
7. Hagmar B, Mango L, Walass L, Ling-Jorgensen J, Kiste R, Ve AM: PAPNET after screening results in 458 cases of routine cervical Pap smears. Acta Cytol 1993;37:592
8. Hatem F, Wilber DC: High grade cervical lesions following negative PAPANICOLAOU smears: False-negative cervical cytology or rapid progression? Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12: 135-141
9. Husain OAN, Butler B, Evans DMD, Macgregor JE, Yule R: Quality control in cervical cytology, J Clin Pathol 1974;27: 935-944
10. Jones BA: Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:1097-1103
11. Kharazi M, Keyhani-Rofagha S, O Toole R: Automated screening of cervical cytology using PAPNET: Comparative cytological findings with biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 99:337-338
12. Kish SK, Shelk D: Evaluation of the performance of the PAPNET automated cytological screening system on the conventionally prepared cervical Pap smears at Hinsdale Hospital, Hinsdale, IL. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:267
13. Koss LG: Cervical smear (Pap): New directions. Cancer 1993; 71:1406-1412
14. Koss LG: Initial study of the efficacy of the PAPNET cytological screening system on biopsy-confirmed abnormal cervical smears. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:269
15. Koss LG: The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA 1989;261:737-743
16. Koss LG: Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. Female Patient 1994; 19:34-40
17. Koss LG, Lin E, Schreiber K, Elgert P, Mango L: Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:220-229
18. Krieger P, Naryshkin S: Random rescreening of cytologic smears: A practical and effective component of quality assurance programs in both large and small cytology laboratories. Acta Cytol 1994;38:291-298
19. Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, Holm K, Hansen MK: Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cytol 1991;35:47-50
20. Malberger E: Determination of the suitability of the PAPNET automated cytological screening system to rapidly implement wide-scale screening for cervical cancer in a population that is currently unscreened. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:272
21. Mango LJ: Computer-assisted cervical cancer screening using neural networks. Cancer Lett 1994;77:155-162
22. Mango LJ: Industrial developments in automated cytology. Neuromedical Systems, Inc. Acta Cytol 1996;40:53-59
23. Mango LJ, Herriman JM: The PAPNET cytological screening system. In Compendium on the Computerized Cytology and Histology Laboratory. Edited by GL Wied, PH Bartels, DL Rosenthal, U Schenck. Chicago, Tutorials of Cytology, 1994, pp 320-334
24. Mango LJ, Holund B, Holm K, Koss LG, Schreiber K, Alonzo A, Decker D: Rescreening of 89 "negative" cervical smears preceding invasive carcinoma by the PAPNET cytological screening system. Acta Cytol 1993;37:780
25. Mango LJ, Ivasauskas EY: Computer-assisted cervical cytology using PAPNET testing. In Compendium on Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology. Edited by GL Wied, CM Keebler, DL Rosenthal, U Schenck, TM Somrak, GP Vooijs. Chicago, Tutorials of Cytology, 1995, pp 155-166
26. Morell ND, Taylor JR, Snyder RN, Ziel HK, Saltz A, Willie S: False negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:41-45
27. Pairwuti S: False negative Papanicolaou smears from women with precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1991;35:40-46
28. Paterson MEL, Peel KR, Joslin CAF: Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire. Br Med J 1984;289:896-898
29. Peters RK, Thomas D, Skoltin CT, Henderson BE: Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after recent negative cytologic test results. A distinct subgroup? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:926-935
30. Rilke F, Mango L, Alasio L: Sensitivity of the PAPNET cytologic screening system to a routine mixture of conventional smears Mod Pathol 1993;6:31a
31. Robertson JH, Woodend B: Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer. Causes and prevention. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46:700-702
32. Rosenthal DL, Acosta DA, Peters RD: Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET testing system. Acta Cytol 1996; 40:120-126
33. Rosenthal DL, Acosta DA, Peters RD: "Negative" Pap smears preceding carcinomas of the cervix: Rescreening with the PAPNET system. Acta Cytol 1993;37:780
34. Rosenthal DL, Mango LJ: Applications of neural networks for interactive diagnosis of anatomic pathology specimens. In Compendium on Computerized Cytology and Histology Laboratory. Edited by GL Wied, PH Bartels, DL Rosenthal, U Schenck. Chicago, Tutorials of Cytology, 1994, pp 173-184
35. Rylander E: Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56:115-118
36. Sherman ME, Mango LJ, Kelly D, Luding V, Pauli G, Copeland C, Solomon D, Schiffman M: II: PAPNET review of smears preceding the diagnosis of high grade squamous epithelial lesion or carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1993;37:781
37. Sherman ME, Mango LJ, Kelly D, Luding V, Pauli G, Copeland C, Solomon D, Schiffman M: II: PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma. Mod Pathol 1994;7:578-581
38. Sherman ME, Kelly D: High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinomas following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: Screening failure or rapid progression? Mod Pathol 1992;5:337-342
39. Slagel AA, Zelsky S, Mano L, Cohen MB: Evaluation of the PAPNET automated cytological screening system for gynaecological smears. Mod Pathol 1993;6:32a
40. van der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HLJ, Daisy MDSGo: Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening. Acta Cytol 1987;31:434-438
41. Wain GV, Farnsworth A, Hacker NF: Cervical carcinoma after negative PAP smears: Evidence against rapid-onset cancers. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:343-345