Dipole modeling in epilepsy surgery candidates

Epilepsia

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 208-218

  Boon, P ^a,b   D'Have M ^b   Adam, C ^a   Vonck, K ^b   Baulac, M ^c   Vandekerckhove, T ^a   De Reuck, J ^b  

^a Departments of Neurology (Epilepsy Monitoring Unit and EEC Laboratory)   (France)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Dipole modeling; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Ictal electroencephalography; Interictal spike; Voltage tomography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPLEX PARTIAL SEIZURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY, COMPLEX PARTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0031052923     PISSN: 00139580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01099.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boon PA, Williamson PD. Presurgical evaluation of patients with intractable partial seizures, indications and evaluation techniques for resective surgery. Clin Neural Neurosiirg 1989:91:3-11.
2. Spencer SS, So NK, Engel J Jr, Williamson PD, Levesque MF, Spencer DD. Depth electrodes. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1993:359-75.
3. Gotman J, Gloor P, Ray WF. A quantitative comparison of traditional reading of the EEC and interpretation of computer extracted features in patients with supratentorial brain lesions. Electroencephalosr Clin Neiirophysiol 1975;38:625-39.
4. Dolisi C, Suisse G, Delport E. Quantitative EEG abnormalities and asymmetries in patients with intracranial tumors. Electroencephalogr Clin Neiirophysiol 1990;76:13-8.
5. Salinsky MC, Oken BS, Kramer RE, Morehead L. A comparison of quantitative EEG frequency analysis and conventional EEG in patients with focal brain lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;83:358-66.
6. Ebersole JS. Equivalent dipole modeling, a new EEG method for localization of epileptogenic foci. In: Pedley TA, Meldrum BS, eds. Recent advances in epilepsy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1992:51-71.
7. Gregory DL, Wong PK. Topographical analysis of the centrotemporal discharges in benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood. Epilepsia 1984;6:705-11.
8. Lesser RP, Lüders HO, Moriis HH, Dinner DS, Wyllie E. Extracranial EEG evaluation. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987:173-81.
9. Wong PK, Gregory DL. Rolandic dipole discharges in children. AM J EEG Techno! 1988:28:243-50.
10. Lüders HO, Dinner DS, Morris HH, Wyllie E, Godoy J. EEG evaluation for epilepsy surgery in children. Cleve Clin J Med 1989;56(suppl)53-61.
11. Ebersole JS, Wade PB. Spike voltage topography identifies two types of frontotemporal epileptic foci. Neurology 1991;41:1425-33.
12. Ebersole JS. EEG dipole modeling in complex partial epilepsy. Brain Topogr 1991;4:113-23.
13. Gregory DL, Wong PK. Clinical relevance of a dipole field in rolandic spikes. Epilepsia 1992;33:36-44.
14. Laxer KD, Rowley AR, Novotny El, et al. Experimental technologies. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1993:291-307.
15. Ebner A, Hoppe M. Non-invasive electroencephalography and mesial temporal sclerosis. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:23-31.
16. Boon PA, Williamson PD, Fried I, et al. Intracranial, intraaxial, space-occupying lesions in patients with intractable partial seizures: an anatomoclinical, neuropsychological and surgical correlation. Epilepsia 1991;32:467-76.
17. Boon PA, De Reuck J, Calliauw L, et al. Clinical and neurophysiological correlations in patients with refractory partial epilepsy and intracranial structural lesions. Acta Neitrochir 1994;128:68-83.
18. Boon P, D'Hâve M. Interictal and ictal dipole modeling in patients with refractory partial seizures and an underlying intracranial structural lesion. Acta Neural Scand 1995;92:7-18.
19. Boon PA. MRI and focal lesions. Acta Neural Scand 1994(suppl 152)89:106-8.
20. Ojemann GA, Engel J Jr. Acute and chronic intracranial recording and stimulation. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987;263-88.
21. Boon P, De Reuck J, Drieghe C, De Bruycker K, Aers I, Pengel J. Long-term video-EEG monitoring revisited; the value of interictal and ictal video-EEG recording, a follow-up study. Enr Neural 1994:34:33-9.
22. Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: Hoke M, ed. Advances in audiology. Basel: Karger, 1990:40-69.
23. Van Den Elsen PA, Viergever MA, Van Huffelen AC, Van Der Meij W, Wieneke GH. Accurate matching of electromagnetic dipole data with CT and MR images. Brain Topogr 1991;4:425-32.
24. Lantz G, Ryding E, Rosen I. Three-dimensional localization of interictal epileptiform activity with dipole analysis: comparison with intracranial recordings and SPECT findings. J Epilepsy 1994; 7:117-29.
25. Scherg M. From EEG source localization to source imaging. Acta Neural Scand 1994(suppl 152)89:29-30.