One worm, 959 cells and 13,000 genes;Un ver, 959 cellules et 13,000 genes

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 156-165

  Félix, Marie Anne ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; RECEPTOR PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE RAS; PROTO ONCOGENE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VULVA;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; MAMMALIA; NEMATODA;

EID: 0031051335     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4267/10608/331     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Wood WB. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. New York : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press, 1988 : 667 p.
2. Horvitz HR, Sternberg PW. Multiple intercellular signalling systems control the development of the C. elegans vulva. Nature 1991 ; 351 : 535-41.
3. Hill RJ, Sternberg PW. The lin-3 gene encodes an inductive signal for vulval development in C. elegans. Nature 1992 ; 358 : 470-6.
4. Aroian RV, Koga M, Mendel JE, Ohshima Y, Sternberg PW. The let-23 gene necessary for Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction encodes a tyrosine kinase of the EGF receptor subfamily. Nature 1990 ; 348 : 693-9.
5. Clark SG, Stern MJ, Horvitz HR. C. elegans cell-signalling gene sem-5 encodes a protein with SH2 and SH3 domains. Nature 1992 ; 356 : 340-4.
6. Han M, Sternberg PW. let-60, a gene that specifies cell fates during C. elegans vulval induction, encodes a Ras protein. Cell 1990 ; 63 : 921-31.
7. Han M, Golden A, Han Y, Sternberg PW. C. elegans lin-45 raf gene participates in let-60 ras stimulated vulval differentiation. Nature 1993 ; 363 : 133-40.
8. Kornfeld K, Guan KL, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans gene mek-2 is required for vulval induction and encodes a protein similar to the protein kinase MEK. Genes Dev 1995 ; 9 : 756-68.
9. Wu Y, Han M, Guan KL. MEK-2, a Caenorhabditis elegans MAP kinase kinase, functions in Ras-mediated vulval induction and other developmental events. Genes Dev 1995 ; 9 : 724-55.
10. Wu Y, Han M. Suppression of activated Let-60 Ras protein defines a role of C. elegans Sur-1 MAP kinase in vulval differentiation. Genes Dev 1994 ; 8 : 147-59.
11. Kahn A. De la membrane an noyau, un couplage direct entre les récepteurs de cytokines et la machinerie transcriptionnelle. Med Sci 1994 ; 10 : 202-5.
12. Beitel GJ, Tuck S, Greenwald I, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans gene lin-1 encodes an ETS-domain protein and defines a branch of the vulval induction pathway. Genes Dev 1995 ; 9 : 3149-62.
13. Miller LM, Gallegos ME, Morisseau BA, Kim SA. lin-31, a Caenorhabditis elegans HNF-3/forkhead transcription factor homolog, specifies three alternative cell fates in vulval development. Genes Dev 1993 ; 7 : 933-47.
14. Huang LS, Tzou P, Steinberg PW. The lin-15 locus encodes two negative regulators of C. elegans vulval development. Mol Biol Cell 1994 ; 5 : 395-412.
15. Clark SG, Lu X, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans locus lin-15, a negatice regulator of a tyrosine kinase signaling pathway, encodes two different proteins. Genetics 1991 ; 137 : 987-97.
16. Singh N. Han M. sur-2, a novel gene, functions late in the let-60 ras-mediated signaling pathway during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction. Genes Dev 1995 ; 9 : 2251-65.
17. Sundaram M, Han M. The C. elegans ksr-1 gene encodes a novel Raf-related kinase involved in ras-mediated signal transduction. Cell 1995 ; 83 : 889-901.
18. Kornfeld K, Hom DB, Horvitz. HR. The ksr-1 gene encodes a novel protein kinase involved in ras-mediated signaling in C. elegans. Cell 1995 ; 83 : 903-13.
19. Yoon CH, Lee J, Jongeward GD, Sternberg PW. Similarity of sli-1, a regulator of vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans, to the mammalian proto-oncogene. c-cbl. Science 1995 ; 269 : 1102-5.
20. Schweisguth F, Israël A. Signalisation intracellulaire par le récepteur Notch : conservation de la drosophile aux mammifères. Med Sci 1996 ; 12 : 155-63.
21. Labouesse M. C. elegans, les promesses d'un petit animal intelligent : Small is beautiful. Med Sci 1994 ; 10 : 337-41.
22. Katz WS, Hill RJ, Clandinin TR, Sternberg PW. Different levels of the C. elegans growth factor LIN-3 promote distinct vulval precursor fates. Cell 1995 ; 82 : 297-307.
23. Koga M, Ohshima Y. Mosaic analysis of the let-23 gene function in vulval induction of caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1995 ; 121 : 2655-66.
24. Simske JS, Kim SK. Sequential signalling during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction. Nature 1995 ; 375 : 142-6.
25. Denis H. Déterminants et polarité embryonnaire. Med Sci 1996 ; 12 : 1281-92.
26. Priess JR, Thomson JN. Cellular interactions in early Caenorhabditis elegant embryos. Cell 1987 ; 48 : 241-50.
27. Goldstein B, Hird S. Specification of the antero-posterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1996 ; 122 : 1467-74.
28. Priess JR. Establishment of initial asym7 metry in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Curr Op Genet Dev 1994 ; 4 : 563-8.
29. White J, Strome S. Cleavage plane specification in C. elegans : how to divide the spoils. Cell 1996 ; 84 : 195-8.
30. Goldstein B. An analysis of the response to gut induction in the C. elegans embryo. Development 1995 ; 121 : 1227-36.
31. Wood WB. Evidence from reversal of handedness in C. elegans for early cell interactions determining cell fates. feature 1991 ; 349 : 536-8.
32. Hutter H, Schnabel R. Glp-I and inductions establishing embryonic axes in C. elegans. Development 1994 ; 120 : 2051-64.
33. Félix MA, Sternberg PW, De Lev P. Sinistral nematode population. Nature 1996 ; 381 : 122.
34. Cowing D, Kenyon, C. Correct Hox gene expression established independently of position in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1996 ; 382 : 353-6.
35. Wilkinson HA, Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I. Reciprocal changes in expression of the receptor lin-12 and its ligand lag-2 prior to commitment in a C. elegans cell fate decision. Cell 1994 ; 79 : 1187-98.
36. Félix MA, Sternberg PW. Symmetry breakage in the development of one-armed gonads in nematodes. Development 1996 ; 122 : 2129-42.