Clinical validation of interactive cytologic screening

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 93-97

  Mango, Laurie Joyce ^a  

^a BD Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical smears; Mass screening; PAPNET

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0031047990     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000332312     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boon ME, Kok LP: Neural network processing can provide means to catch errors that slip through human screening of Pap smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:411-416
2. Boon ME, Kok LP, Beck S: Histologic validation of neural network-assisted cervical screening: Comparison with the conventional procedure. Cell Vision 1995;2:23-27
3. Boon ME, Kok LP, Nygaard-Nielsen M, Holm K, Holund B: Neural network processing of cervical smears can lead to a decrease in diagnostic variability and an increase in screening efficiency: A study of 63 false-negative smears. Mod Pathol 1994;7:957-961
4. Farnsworth A, Chambers F, Goldschmidt C: PAPNET: An Australian experience of over 60,000 cases. Med J Aust 1996; 165:429-431
5. Hatem F, Wilbur DC: High grade squamous cervical lesions following negative Papanicolaou smears: False-negative cervical cytology or rapid progression. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:135-141
6. Hoda RS, Saccomanno G, Schreiber K, Decker D, Koss LG: Automated sputum screening on PAPNET: A study of 122 cases. Hum Pathol 1996;27:656-659
7. Hoda RS, Tahir-Kheli ND, Decker DB: Urine screening on PAPNET: A study of 50 cases (abstr). Acta Cytol 1995;39: 1068
8. Keyhani-Rofagha S, Palma T, O'Toole RV: Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: A study of 638 negative Pap smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:316-320
9. Kok MR, Boon ME: Consequences of neural network technology for cervical screening. Cancer 1996;78:111-118
10. Mitchell H, Medley G: Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology 1995;6:368-375
11. Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Boon ME, Beck S: Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: Comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist. Cytopathology 1994;5:211-218
12. Rosenthal DL, Acosta D, Peters RK: Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET testing system. Acta Cytol 1996;40:120-126
13. Ryan MR, Stastny JF, Pedigo MA, Cahill LA, Frable WJ: PAP-NET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: A study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105:711-718
14. Sherman ME, Kelly D: High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: Screening failures or rapid progression. Mod Pathol 1992;5:337-342
15. Slagel DD, Zaleski S, Cohen MB: The efficacy of automated cervical cytology screening. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;13:26-30