-
1
-
-
0000957380
-
The robustness of common measures of 2 × 2 association bias due to misclassification
-
1. Kraemer HC. The robustness of common measures of 2 × 2 association bias due to misclassification. Am Stat 1985; 239: 286-290.
-
(1985)
Am Stat
, vol.239
, pp. 286-290
-
-
Kraemer, H.C.1
-
2
-
-
84952516386
-
Assessment of 2 × 2 associations: Generalization of signal-detection methodology
-
2. Kraemer HC. Assessment of 2 × 2 associations: Generalization of signal-detection methodology. Am Stat 1988; 240: 37-49.
-
(1988)
Am Stat
, vol.240
, pp. 37-49
-
-
Kraemer, H.C.1
-
3
-
-
0024240106
-
Kappa coefficients in epidemiology: An appraisal of a reappraisal
-
3. Kraemer HC, Bloch DA. Kappa coefficients in epidemiology: An appraisal of a reappraisal. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 959-968.
-
(1988)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.41
, pp. 959-968
-
-
Kraemer, H.C.1
Bloch, D.A.2
-
4
-
-
0026579239
-
Sensitivity-and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement
-
4. Coughlin SS, Pickle LW. Sensitivity-and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement. Epidemiology 192; 3: 178-181.
-
Epidemiology
, vol.192
, Issue.3
, pp. 178-181
-
-
Coughlin, S.S.1
Pickle, L.W.2
-
5
-
-
0026783127
-
Chance-corrected sensitivity and specificity for three-zone diagnostic tests
-
5. Jamart J. Chance-corrected sensitivity and specificity for three-zone diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1035-1039.
-
(1992)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.45
, pp. 1035-1039
-
-
Jamart, J.1
-
6
-
-
0028227279
-
Chance-corrected measures of the validity of a binary diagnostic test
-
6. Brenner H, Gefeller O. Chance-corrected measures of the validity of a binary diagnostic test. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 627-633.
-
(1994)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.47
, pp. 627-633
-
-
Brenner, H.1
Gefeller, O.2
-
7
-
-
0028302183
-
How to correct for chance agreement in the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests
-
7. Gefeller O, Brenner H. How to correct for chance agreement in the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 180-186.
-
(1994)
Meth Inform Med
, vol.33
, pp. 180-186
-
-
Gefeller, O.1
Brenner, H.2
-
8
-
-
0016750401
-
Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of trait
-
8. Fleiss JL. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of trait. Biometrics 1975; 31: 651-659.
-
(1975)
Biometrics
, vol.31
, pp. 651-659
-
-
Fleiss, J.L.1
-
9
-
-
0025286295
-
High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes
-
9. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 543-549.
-
(1990)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.43
, pp. 543-549
-
-
Feinstein, A.R.1
Cicchetti, D.V.2
-
10
-
-
0020083498
-
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
-
10. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
-
(1982)
Radiology
, vol.143
, pp. 29-36
-
-
Hanley, J.A.1
McNeil, B.J.2
|