Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: Is a single pH electrode sufficient?

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 263-270

  Fisher, R S ^a   Sher, D J ^b   Donahue, D ^b   Knight, L C ^b   Maurer, A ^b   Urbain, J L ^b   Krevsky, B ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTACID AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIET RESTRICTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ISOTOPE LABELING; MALE; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; NORMAL HUMAN; PH ELECTRODE; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOMACH PH; TEST MEAL; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; ANTACIDS; ELECTRODES; FASTING; GASTRIC ACIDITY DETERMINATION; GASTRIC EMPTYING; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; MALE; POSTPRANDIAL PERIOD; REFERENCE VALUES; STOMACH; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0031038642     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Marcussen JM, Rygvold O. Intragastric pH recording in controlled series of double tests. Acta Med Scand 1961;169:617-21.
2. Tomenius J, Williams G. Continuously recorded pH of gastric and duodenal contents in situ with an evaluation of the efficacy of some antacids in vivo. Acta Med Scand 1960;166:25-34.
3. Andres MR, Bingham JR. Tubeless gastric analysis with a radiotelemetering pill (Heidelberg Capsule). Can Med Assoc J 1970;102:1087-9.
4. Mela GS, Savarino V, Moretti M, et al. Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24 hour studies of gastric acidity. Dig Dis Sci 1990;36:1473-81.
5. Rovelstad R, Owen CA, Magath TB. Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents. Gastroenterology 1952;20:609-24.
6. Savarino V, Mela GS, Scalabrini P, et al. 24-H comparison between pH values of continuous intraluminal recording and simultaneous gastric aspiration. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987;22:135-40.
7. Reynolds JR, Walt RP, Hardcastle JD, et al. 24-hour intragastric pH: Continuous monitoring or nasogastric aspiration? Digestion 1986;33: 219-24.
8. 2-antagonists. Gastroenterology 1985;88:1842-51.
9. Meiners D, Clift S, Kaminski D. Evaluation of various techniques to monitor intragastric pH. Arch Surg 1982;117:288-91.
10. Sjoberg F, Tibbling L, Sandstedt S. Comparison of pH probe-nasogastric tube with aspirated gastric pH. Crit Care Med 1992;20:552-4.
11. Mattioli S, Felice V, Pilotti V, et al. Indications for 24-hour gastric pH monitoring with single and multiple probes in clinical research and practice. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1793-801.
12. Cilluffo T, Armstrong D, Castilgione F, et al. Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum: Effect of food, time and electrode position. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990;25: 1076-83.
13. Eisenberg PG, Cort D, Zuckerman G. Prospective trial comparing a combination pH probe-nasogastric tube with aspirated gastric pH in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 1990;18:1092-5.
14. Fisher RS, Sher DJ, Donahue D, et al. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity. Amer J Gastroenterol 1996 June (in Press).
15. Krawiec J, Odes HS, Schwartz B, et al. Regional difference in ambient intraluminal gastric acidity after cimetidine monitored by intragastric pH-metry. Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:272-5.
16. McLauchlan G, Fullarton GM, Crean GP, et al. Comparison of gastric body and antral pH: A 24 hour ambulatory study in healthy volunteers. Gut 1989;30:573-8.
17. Moore EW, Scarlata RW. The determination of gastric acidity by the glass electrode. Gastroenterology 1965;49:178-88.
18. Fordtran JS, Collyns JAH. Antacid pharmacology in duodenal ulcer: Effect of antacids on postcibal gastric acidity and peptic activity. N Engl J Med 1966;274:921-7.
19. Krisner JB, Palmer WL. Effects of various antacids on hydrogen-ion concentration of gastric contents. Am J Dig Dis 1940;7:85-93.
20. Kirsner JB. Further study of effect of various antacids on hydrogen-ion concentration of gastric contents. Am J Dig Dis 1941;8:53-6.
21. Bauerfeind P, Cilluffo T, Emde C, et al. Antacids revisited: How do they interact with food in vivo? Gastroenterology 1986;90:1340 (abstract).
22. Schurer-Maly CC, Varga L, Halter F. Interaction of liquid aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide with the gastric acid profile: Influence of food components and timing of meals. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:263-9.
23. Mones J, Carrio I, Roca M, et al. Gastric emptying of two radiolabelled antacids. Gut 1991;32:147-50.
24. Hursvitz A, Robinson RG, Vats TS, et al. Effects of antacids on gastric emptying. Gastroenterology 1976;71:268-73.
25. Marano AR, Caride VJ, Prokop EK, et al. Effect of sucralfate and aluminum hydroxide gel on gastric emptying of solids and liquids. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985;37:629-32.
26. Bauerfeind P, Cilluffo T, Armstrong D, et al. Fate of antacid gel in the stomach: Site of action and interaction with food. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35:553-8.
27. Vatier JL, Zhixin G, Xiao-Mei FC, et al. Evidence for the interaction between antacid and gastric mucosa using an "artificial stomach" model including gastric mucosa. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992;263: 1206-11.
28. Guillet J, Role C, Imbert Y, et al. 99mTc labelled colloidal aluminum phosphate (CAP) and sucralfate (S): Are they suitable to diagnose and follow up oesogastroduodenal ulcerations? Eur J Nucl Med 1988;14: 214 (abstract).