The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds

Ergonomics

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-77

  Arthur, E J ^a   Hancock, P A ^a   Chrysler, S T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Spatial orientation; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USER INTERFACES;

COMPLEX SPATIAL LAYOUT; FREE BINOCULAR VIRTUAL CONDITIONS; STATIC MONOCULAR VIEW;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0031034965     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401397188387     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ABBOTT, E. A. 1926, Flatland, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
2. CAIRD, J. K. and HANCOCK, P. A. 1991, Perceived spatial layout of a simulated scene as a function of experience, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35, 1447-1450.
3. DAVISON, M. L. 1992, Personal communication.
4. DURLACH, N. I. and MAVOR, A. S. 1995 (Eds), Virtual reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges. National Academy Press, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
5. ELLIS, S. 1991, Nature origins of virtual environments: a bibliographical essay, Computer Systems in Engineering, 2, 321.
6. FERGUSON, E. L. and HEGARTY, M. 1994, Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts, Memory & Cognition, 22, 455-473.
7. FRANKLIN, N. and TVERSKY, B. 1990, Searching imagined environments, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63-76.
8. FURNESS, T. A. 1988, Harnessing virtual space. Human Interface Technology Laboratory Report HITL-M-88-1.
9. HANCOCK, P. A. 1996a, Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload, Ergonomics, 39, 1146-1162.
10. HANCOCK, P. A. 1996b, On convergent technological evolution, Ergonomics in Design, 4(1), 22-29.
11. HELANDER, M. (Ed.) 1989, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
12. HENRY, D. and FURNESS, T. 1993, Spatial perception in virtual environments: evaluating an architectural application, Technical Report No. FU-20. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
13. KOSSLYN, S. M., PICK, H. L., Jr. and FARIELLO, G. R. 1974, Cognitive maps in children and men, Child Development, 45, 707-716.
14. KOZAK, J. J., HANCOCK, P. A., ARTHUR, E. J. and CHRYSLER, S. T. 1993, Transfer of training from virtual reality, Ergomonics, 36, 777-784.
15. KRUGER, M. 1991, Artificial Reality II, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
16. MCNAMARA, T. P. 1986, Mental representations of spatial relations, Cognitive Psychology, 18, 87-121.
17. MCNAMARA, T. P. and LESEUR, L. L. 1989, Mental representations of spatial and nonspatial relations, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 215-233.
18. MCNAMARA, T. P., HARDY, J. K. and HIRTLE, S. C. 1989, Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 211-227.
19. MCNAMARA, T. P., RATCLIFF, R. and MCKOON, G. 1984, The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723-732.
20. NORMAN, D. A. 1992, Turn Signals are the Facial Expressions of Automobiles, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
21. PERUCH, P and LAPIN, E. A. 1993, Route knowledge in different spatial frames of reference, Acta Psychologica, 84, 253-269.
22. PERUCH, P., VERCHER, J., and GAUTHIER, G. M. 1995, Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments, Ecological Psychology, 7(1), 1-20.
23. PRESSON, C. C. and HAZELRIGG, M. D. 1984, Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716-722.
24. PRESSON, C. C., DELANGE, N. and HAZELRIGG, M. D. 1989, Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
25. RHEINGOLD, H. 1991, Virtual Reality (Summit Books, New York).
26. RIESER, J. 1989, Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
27. SHERIDAN, T. B. 1992, Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
28. SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1983, Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages, IEEE Computer, 16, 57-69.
29. TAYLOR, H. A. and TVERSKY, B. 1992a, Descriptions and depictions of environments, Memory & Cognition, 20, 483-496.
30. TAYLOR, H. A. and TVERSKY, B. 1992b, Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions, Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261-292.
31. THORNDYKE, P. W. and HAYES-ROTH, B. 1982, Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation, Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
32. TVERSKY, B. 1981, Distortions in memory for maps, Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407-433.
33. WELLS, M. J. 1992, Virtual reality: technology, experience, assumptions, Human Factors Society Bulletin, 35(9), 1-3.