Historical dose reconstruction project: Estimating the population at risk

Health Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 186-194

  Felix Rogers, J ^a   Killough, George G ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b Hendecagon Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

dose assessment; dose, population; exposure, radiation; health effects

Indexed keywords

RADIOISOTOPE;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; DOSIMETRY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; POPULATION RISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX RATIO;

EID: 0031025226     PISSN: 00179078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199702000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ahlburg, D. A.; Vaupel, J. W. Alternative projections of the U.S. population. Demography 27:639-652; 1990.
2. Alho, J. M. Estimating time exposure distributions. Demography 27:313-321; 1990.
3. Bureau of the Census. Census of the population - 1950, Volume II. Characteristics of the population, Part 35, Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 1952.
4. Bureau of the Census. Census of the population - 1960, Volume I. Characteristics of the population, Part 37, Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 1961.
5. Bureau of the Census. Census of the population - 1970, Volume 1. General population characteristics, Part 37, Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 1971.
6. Bureau of the Census. Census of the population - 1980, Volume 1. General population characteristics, Part 37, Ohio. Washington, DC; U.S. Department of commerce; 1982.
7. Bureau of the Census. Census of the Population - 1990, Volume 1. General population characteristics, Part 37, Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce; 1991.
8. Coughlan, J. E. Asian Indians in Australia: A statistical profile based on the 1986 census. Populat. Rev. 37:21-45; 1993.
9. Department of Natural Resources, Ohio. Publication Center; Columbus, OH: USGS Quadrant Maps, 1992.
10. Detroit Regional Census Center. U.S. census block maps. Southfield, MI: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1992.
11. Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana Regional Council of Governments. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Census Block Maps and Data; 1992.
12. Pittenger, D. B. Population estimates by age, sex and race for 10-county study area. Letter Report. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory; 1992.
13. Rees, P. Developments in the modeling of spatial populations. In: Woods, R.; Rees, P., eds. Population structures and models. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.; 1986: 97-125.
14. Radiological Assessments Corporation. Work plan for the Fernald dosimetry reconstruction project, Task 4: Environmental pathway analysis. Neeses, SC: RAC; 1990.
15. Schmertmann, C. P. Estimation of historical migration rates from a single census: Interregnal migration in Brazil. Population Studies 46:103-120; 1992.
16. Smith, S. K. A review and evaluation of the housing unit method of population estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81:287-296; 1986.
17. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor Safety Study, Appendix VI: Calculation of reactor accident consequences. USNRC WASH-1400, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1975.
18. Van ImHoff, E. A general characterization of consistency algorithms in multidimensional demographic projection models. Population Studies 46:159-169; 1992.
19. Willekens, F.; Baydar, N. Forecasting place-to-place migration with generalized linear models. In: Woods, R.; Rees, P., eds. Population structures and models. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.; 1986: 203-244.