Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 369 consecutive carotid artery revascularizations

European Neurology

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-47

  Ballotta, Enzo ^a   Dagiau, Giuseppe ^a   Satadini, Marina ^a   Bottio, Tomaso ^a   Abbruzzese, Elvira ^a   Meneghetti, Giorgio ^a   Guerra, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carotid endarterectomy and patch; EEG monitoring; Graft angioplasty Carotid eversion endarterectomy Carotid tortuosity; Intraluminal shunt

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTERY CLAMP; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMPLANTATION; REVASCULARIZATION; SHUNTING; STROKE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME; TRANSITIONAL BLINDNESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID STENOSIS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBRAL REVASCULARIZATION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; REACTION TIME; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0031025132     PISSN: 00143022     EISSN: 14219913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000117404     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endar-terectomy Trial Collaborator: Beneficial effect of carotid endartercctomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453.
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialisl's Collaborative Group: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0 29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1255-1266.
3. Naylor AR, Bell PRF, Ruckley CV: Monitoring and cerebral protection during carotid endar-terectomy. Br J Surg 1992:79:735-741.
4. Boysen G: Cerebral blood flow measurement as a safeguard during carotid endartcrectomy. Stroke 1971;2:1-10.
5. Moore WS, Yec JM, Hall AD: Collateral cerebral blood pressure: An index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion. Arch Surg 1973; 13:319-326.
6. Matsumoto GH, Baker JD, Watson CW, et al: EEG surveillance as a means of extending operability in high-risk carotid endarterectomv. Stroke 1976;7:554-556.
7. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Picpgrass DG, et al: Correlation of cerebral blood flow and clectroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomv. Mayo Clin Proc 1981:56: 533-543.
8. Hunter G, Sieffert G, Malone J, et al: The accuracy of carotid back pressure as a guide for operative management for carotid cndarterec-tomy. Surgery 1981:13:319-326.
9. Ferguson GG: Intraoperativc monitoring and internal shunt: Are they necessary in carotid endarterectomy? Stroke 1982; 13:287-289.
10. Blume WT, Ferguson GG, McNeill DK: Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1986;17:891-897.
11. Ackerstaff RGA, Krul JMJ, Eikelboom BC, et al: Automatic EEG monitoring and stroke detection during carotid endarterectomy. Neuro-physiol Clin 1990:20:23.
12. Markand ON, Dilley RS, Morthy SS, et al: Monitoring of somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endartcrectomy. Anesthesiology 1984:41:375-378.
13. Symon L, Wang AD, Rosestein J, et al: Effect of brain ischemia on evoked electrical activity in man. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:S37-S38.
14. Haupt WF, Horsch S: Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: A review of 994 cases. Neurology 1992:42:835-838.
15. Kearse LA, Brown EN, McPeck K: Somatosensory evoked potentials sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1992; 23:498-505.
16. Deriu GP, Ballotta E, Bonavina L, et al: The rationale for patch graft angioplasty after carotid endartcrectomy: Early and long-term follow-up. Stroke 1984; 15:972.
17. Meneghetti G, Ballotta E, Deriu GP, et al: Continuous intraoperative EEG monitoring during carotid surgery. Eur Neurol 1984:23:82.
18. Ballotta E, Deriu GP, Facco E, et al: Stroke risk reduction in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients surgically treated: The effectiveness of carotid endartcrectomy with patch graft angioplasty. Eur J Vase Surg 1988:2:87-91.
19. Van Alphen Ham, Polman CFI: The value of continuous intraopcrative EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Acta Ncuro-chir 1988;91:94-99.
20. Facco E, Dona B, Ballotta E, et al: EEG monitoring of carotid endarterectomy with routine patch-graft angioplasty: An experience in a large series. Neurophysiol Clin 1992:22:437-446.
21. Harris EJ, Brown WH, Pavy RN, et al: Continuous clectroencephalographic monitoring during carotid artery endarterectomy. Surgery 1967:62:441-447.
22. Baker JD, Gluecklich B, Watson CW, et al: An evaluation of electroencephalographic monitoring for carotid surgery. Surgery 1975;78: 787-794.
23. Chiappa KH, Burke SR, Young RR: Results of clectroencephalographic monitoring during 367 carotid endarterectomies. Stroke 1979:10: 381-388.
24. Sundt TM Jr, Sharbrough FW, Trautman JC, et al: Monitoring techniques for carotid endartcrectomy. Clin Neurosurg 1975;22:199-213.
25. Crowell RM, Olsson Y, Klatzo I: Cerebral artery in the monkey: Clinical and pathological observations. Stroke 1970;1:439-448.
26. Riles TS, Imparato AM, Jacobowitz GR, et al: The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. J Vase Surg 1994; 19:206-216.