General practitioners' views on the implementation of community-led maternity care in South Camden, London

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 47, Issue 414, 1997, Pages 45-46

  Fleissig, Anne ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community care; Maternity services; Midwives; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY CARE; COOPERATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORKLOAD;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LONDON; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDWIFERY; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0031024567     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Health Committee Second Report (Winterton Report). Maternity services. Vol 1 (report together with appendices and the proceedings of the committee). House of Commons, Session 1991-2. London: HMSO, 1992.
2. Department of Health. Changing childbirth (Cumberlege Report). (Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group.) London: HMSO, 1993.
3. Zander LI. The contribution of the general practitioner to maternity care. In: Chamberlain G and Patel N (eds). The future of the maternity services. London: RCOG Press, 1994.
4. Kroll D. Tunafanya nini - what business are we in? In: Chamberlain G and Patel N (eds). The future of the maternity services. London: RCOG Press, 1994.
5. Smith LFP. Should general practitioners have any role in maternity care in the future? Dr J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 243-247.