Parental history of diabetes in an insulin-treated diabetes registry

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 35-41

  Riley, M D ^a,d   Blizzard, C L ^a   McCarty, D J ^b   Senator, G B ^c   Dwyer, T ^a   Zimmet, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b BAKER IDI HEART AND DIABETES INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c ROYAL HOBART HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d The Menzies Foundation   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Family history; Genetics; Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEREDITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BODY MASS INDEX; COHORT STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FATHERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTHERS; REGISTRIES; TASMANIA;

EID: 0031022659     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199701)14:1<35::AID-DIA296>3.0.CO;2-I     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Morris RD, Rimm DL, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK, Rimm AA. Obesity and heredity in the etiology of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in 32,662 adult white women. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: 112-121.
2. Alcolado C, Alcolado R. Importance of maternal history of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Br Med J 1991; 302: 1178-1180.
3. Thomas F, Balkau B, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Popoz L, and the CODIAB-INSERM-ZENECA Study Group. Maternal effect and familial aggregation in NIDDM: The CODIAB Study. Diabetes 1994; 43: 63-67.
4. Gauguier D, Nelson I, Bernard C, Parent V, Marsac C, Cohen D, et al. Higher maternal than paternal inheritance of diabetes in GK rats. Diabetes 1994; 43: 220-224.
5. Pettitt DJ, Aleck KA, Baird HA, Carraher MJ, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Congenital susceptibility to NIDDM: Role of intrauterine environment. Diabetes 1988; 37: 622-628.
6. Mitchell BD, Valdez R, Hazuda H, Haffner SM, Monterrosa A, Stern MP. Differences in the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance according to maternal or paternal history of diabetes. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 1262-1267.
7. Lin RS, Lee WC, Lee Y, Chou P, Fu C. Maternal role in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: indirect evidence for a mitochondrial inheritance, Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 886-890.
8. Ballinger SW, Shoffner JM, Hedaya EV, Tounce I, Polak MA, Koontz DA, Wallace DC. Maternally transmitted diabetes and deafness associated with a 10.4 Kb mitochondrial DNA deletion. Nature Genet 1990; 1: 11-15.
9. Reardon W, Ross RJM, Sweeney MG, et al. Diabetes mellitus associated with a pathogenic point mutation in mitochondrial DNA. Lancet 1992; 340: 1376-1379.
10. Nelson DL, Warren ST. Trinucleotide repeat instability: when and where? Nature Genet 1993; 4: 107-108.
11. Cox NJ. Maternal component in NIDDM transmission: how large an effect? Diabetes 1994; 43: 166-168.
12. King H, Senator G, Zimmet P, Harris A. The Tasmanian Insulin-treated Diabetes Register: inception and progress in the first twelve months. Med J Aust 1986; 144: 414-416.
13. King H, Dixon J, Senator G, Zimmet P. Insulin-treated diabetes in Tasmania: population-based clinical characteristics and their possible implications for diabetic health care in Australia. Med J Aust 1989; 151: 444-450.
14. Prior MJ, Prout T, Miller D, Ewart R, Kumar D, ETDRS Research Group. C-peptide and the classification of diabetes mellitus patients in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report Number 6. Ann Epidemiol 1993; 3: 9-17.
15. Toumi T, Groop LC, Zimmet PZ, Rowley MJ, Knowles W, Mackay IR. Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveal latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults with a non-insulin-dependent onset of disease. Diabetes 1993; 42: 359-362.
16. Zimmet P, King H. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. In: Alberti KGGM, Krall L, eds. Diabetes Annual 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987: 1-22.
17. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979; 28: 1039-1057.
18. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, 4th edn, vol. 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1989.
19. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
20. Kahn LB, Marshall JA, Baxter J, Shetterly SM, Hamman RF. Accuracy of reported family history of diabetes mellitus: results from the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1990; 13: 796-798.
21. Lapidus L, Bengtsson C, Lissner L, Smith U. Family history of diabetes in relation to different types of obesity and change of obesity during 12-yr period: results from prospective population study of women in Goteborg, Sweden. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1455-1458.
22. Webb TP, Bundey SE, Thake AI, Todd J. The frequency of the fragile X chromosome among schoolchildren in Coventry. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23: 573-580.
23. Gustavson KH, Blomquist H, Holmgren G. Prevalence of fragile X syndrome in mentally retarded children in a Swedish country. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23: 581-588.
24. Harper PS. Myotonic Dystrophy, 2nd edn. London: W.B. Saunders, 1989.
25. Hales CN, Barker DJP. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia 1992; 35: 595-601.
26. Freinkel N. Of pregnancy and progeny. Diabetes 1980; 29: 1023-1039.
27. El-Hashimy M, Angelico MC, Martin BC, Krolewski AS, Warram JH. Factors modifying the risk of IDDM in offspring of an IDDM parent. Diabetes 1995; 44: 295-299.