Comparison of SureSkin®, DuoDerm E® and Jelonet® Gauze in split skin donor sites - A clinical and histological evaluation

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 18-22

  Steenfos, Henrik ^a,b   Partoft, Søren ^a   Timshel, Susanne ^a   Balslev, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

dressing; moist wound healing; split skin donor sites

Indexed keywords

DUODERM; DUODERM E; JELONET; SURESKIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDROCOLLOID; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN INJURY; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0031022133     PISSN: 09269959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9959(96)00076-1     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Eaglstein WH. Occlusive dressings. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993;19:716-720.
2. Burton CS III. Treatment of leg ulcers. Dermatol Clin 1993;11:207-213.
3. Madden RM, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL, Yort RW, Smeland J, Goodwin CW, Hefton J, Staiano-Coico L. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma 1989;29:924-931.
4. Smith DJ, Thomson PD, Bolton LL, Hutchinson JJ. Microbiology and healing of the occluded skin graft-donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:1094-1097.
5. Leicht P, Siim E, Sørensen B. Treatment of donor sites - DuoDerm® or Omiderm®, Burns 1989;15:7-10.
6. Champson A et al. Use of DuoDerm® on Donor Sites after Skin Grafting. A Comparative Study with Tullegras. Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symp Ser. No. 88, London, 1984.
7. Woolf CM. Principles of Biometry. Dvan Nestrand Co., Princeton, NJ, 1968.