Illusory safeguards: Legitimizing distortion in recall with guidelines for forensic hypnosis - Two case reports

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 18-40

  Karlin, Robert A ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RECALL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; WITNESS;

EID: 0031019683     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207149708416104     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alves, W., Macciocchi, S., & Barth, J. (1993). Post concussion symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 48-59.
2. American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. (1985). Scientific status of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 253, 1918-1923. (Reprinted in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1986, 34, 1-12.)
3. American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. (1985). Scientific status of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 253, 1918-1923. (Reprinted in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1986, 34, 1-12.)
4. American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. (1994). Memories of childhood abuse. CSA Report 5-A-94. (Reprinted in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1995, 43, 114-115.)
5. American Medical Association, Council on Scientific Affairs. (1994). Memories of childhood abuse. CSA Report 5-A-94. (Reprinted in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1995, 43, 114-115.)
6. Baddeley, A., Wilson, B., & Watts, F. (Eds.) (1995). Handbook of memory disorders. Chichester, England: Wiley.
7. Bjork, R. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Boggs, B. (1993). Rethinking the ban on hypnotically enhanced testimony. Illinois Bar Journal, 81, 136-137.
9. Borawick v. Shay and Shay, 68 F.3d 597 (2nd Cir.) (1995).
10. Brown, D. (1995). Pseudomemories: The standard of science and the standard of care in trauma treatment. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 1-24.
11. California v. Quaglino, 439 U.S. 875, 99 S. Ct. 212, 58 L.Ed. 2d 189 (1978).
12. Cutler, B., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.
13. Cutler, B., Penrod, S., & Stuve, T. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
14. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 125 L.Ed. 2d 469 (1993).
15. Diamond, B. (1980). Inherent problems in the use of pretrial hypnosis on a prospective witness. California Law Review, 68, 313-349.
16. Dikmen, S., McLean, A., & Temkin, N. (1986). Neuropsychological and psychological consequences of minor head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 48, 1227-1232.
17. Dywan, J. (1995). The illusion of familiarity: An alternative to the report-criterion account of hypnotic recall. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 43, 194-211.
18. Dywan, J., & Bowers, K. S. (1983). The use of hypnosis to enhance recall. Science, 222, 184-185.
19. Frankel, F. H. (1994). The concept of flashbacks in historical perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 321-336.
20. Fromm, E. (1978-1979). Primary and secondary process in waking and in altered states of consciousness. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4, 115-128.
21. Fromm, E., & Kahn, S. (1990). Self-hypnosis: The Chicago paradigm. New York: Guilford.
22. Frye v. United States, 293 F1013 (D.C. Cir.) (1923).
23. Hypnosis and Memory Committee of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis. (1995). Clinical hypnosis and memory: Guidelines for clinicians and for forensic hypnosis. Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Clinical Hypnosis Press.
24. Karlin, R. A. (1983). Forensic hypnosis - Two case reports: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 227-234.
25. Kluft, R. (1993, October). Multiple personality disorder: A contemporary perspective. Harvard Mental Health Newsletter, pp. 5-7.
26. Landauer, T., & Bjork, R. (1978). Optimal rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London: Academic Press.
27. Laurence, J.-R., Nadon, R., Nogrady, H., & Perry, C. (1986). Duality, dissociation, and memory creation in highly hypnotizable subjects. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 295-310.
28. Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1983). Hypnotically created memory in highly hypnotizable subjects. Science, 222, 523-524.
29. Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1988). Hypnosis, will, and memory: A psycho-legal history. New York: Guilford.
30. Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Loftus, E., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory. New York: St. Martin's.
32. Lynn, S. J., Milano, M., & Weekes, J. (1991). Hypnosis and pseudomemories: The effects of prehypnotic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 318-326.
33. Manson v. Braithwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 112, 97 S. Ct. 2243, 2252, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977).
34. McConkey, K. M., & Sheehan, P. W. (1995). Hypnosis, memory, and behavior in criminal investigation. New York: Guilford.
35. McHugh, P. (1993, October). Multiple personality disorder. Harvard Mental Health Newsletter, pp. 4-7.
36. Miloš, R. (1975). Hypnotic exploration of amnesia after cerebral injuries. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 23, 103-110.
37. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 909, 100 S. Ct. 221, 62 L.Ed.2d 144 (1979).
38. Orne, E. C., Whitehouse, W. G., Dinges, D. F., & Orne, M. T. (1996). Memory liabilities associated with hypnosis: Does low hypnotizability confer immunity? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 354-369.
39. Orne, M. T. (1975, October). Workshop for residents in psychiatry. Presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Chicago.
40. Orne, M. T. (1978). Affidavit of Amicus Curiae, Quaglino v. California, U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 77-1288, cert. den. 11/27/78. In E. Margolin (Chm). 16th Annual defending criminal cases: The rapidly changing practice of criminal law (Vol. 2, pp 831-857). New York: Practicing Law Institute.
41. Orne, M. T., & Hammer, A. G. (1974). Hypnosis. In Encyclopedia Britannica (15th ed., pp. 133-140). Chicago: William Benton.
42. Orne, M. T. , Soskis, D. A., Dinges, D. F., & Orne, E. C. (1984). Hypnotically induced testimony. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 171-213). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. People v. Kempinski, Docket No. W8OCF 352 (Cir. Ct., 12th Dist. Will County, October 21, 1980, unreported).
44. People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.3d 18 723 P.2d 1354, 181 Cal. Reptr. 243 (1982), stay denied, California v. Shirley, 458 U.S. 1125, 102 S. Ct. 13, 73, L.Ed.2d (1982) cert. denied, California v. Shirley, 459 U.S. 860, 103 S. Ct. 133, 74 L.Ed.2d. 114 (1982).
45. People v. Zayas, 131 III.2d 284 (1989).
46. Perry, C., Orne, M. T., London, R. W., & Orne, E. C. (1996). Rethinking per se exclusions of hypnotically elicited recall as legal testimony. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 66-81.
47. Piper, A. (1993). "Truth serum" and "recovered memories" of sexual abuse: A review of the evidence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 21, 447-471.
48. Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 (1987).
49. Scheflin, A. W., & Shapiro, J. L. (1989). Trance on trial. New York: Guilford.
50. Shaw, J. (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126-146.
51. Sheehan, P. W. (1988). Confidence, memory, and hypnosis. In H. M. Pettinatti (Ed.), Hypnosis and memory (pp. 95-127). New York: Guilford.
52. Spanos, N. P., & McLean, J. (1986). Hypnotically created pseudomemories: Memory distortions or reporting biases? British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 3, 155-159.
53. Spanos, N. P., Quigley, C. A., Gwynn, M. I., Glatt, R. L., & Perlini, A. H. (1991). Hypnotic interrogation, pretrial preparation, and witness testimony during direct and cross examination. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 639-654.
54. Spence, D. P. (1994). Narrative truth and putative child abuse. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 289-303.
55. Sporer, S., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
56. Sprynczynatyk v. General Motors, 771 F.2d 1112 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1046, 106 S. Ct. 1263, 89 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986).
57. State v. Fertig, 143 N.J. 115 (1996).
58. State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 432 A.2d 86 (1981).
59. State v. Mack, 292 N.W.2d 764 (Minnesota, 1980).
60. Steblay, N. M., & Bothwell, R. B. (1994). Evidence for hypnotically refreshed testimony: The view from the laboratory. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 635-651.
61. Tardi v. Henry, 212 Il. App.3d 1027 (1991).
62. Wells, G., Lindsay, R., & Ferguson, T. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.
63. Whitehouse, W. G., Dinges, D. F., Orne, E. C., & Orne, M. T. (1988). Hypnotic hypermnesia: Enhanced memory accessibility or report bias? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 289-295.