Transmembrane potentials during high voltage shocks in ischemic cardiac tissue

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 20, Issue 1 SUPPL., 1997, Pages 146-152

  Holley, L K ^a   Knisley, S B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

defibrillation; high voltage shocks; transmembrane potential

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVERSION; DEFIBRILLATION; DEPOLARIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE FIBER MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE POTENTIAL; HEART PACING; NONHUMAN;

EID: 0031017269     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04832.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1 Zhou X, Ideker RE, Blitchington TF, et al. Optical membrane potential measurements during defibrillation‐strength shocks in perfused rabbit hearts. Circ Res 1995 ; 77: 593–602.
2. 2 Zhou X, Rollins DL, Smith WM, et al. Responses of the transmembrane potential of myocardial cells during a shock. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995 ; 6: 252–263.
3. 3 Jones JL, Jones Rk, Milne KB. Refractory period prolongation by biphasic defibrillator waveforms is associated with enhanced sodium current in a computer model of the ventricular action potential. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994 ; 41: 60–68.
4. 4 Dillon SM. Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period. Circ Res 1991 ; 69: 842–856.
5. 5 Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al. Improved low energy efficacy in man with the use ofa biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Am Heart J 1989 ; 117: 122–127.
6. 6 Holley LK, Mc Culloch. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic defibrillation waveforms in an isolated rabbit heart preparation. Cardiovasc Res 1991 ; 25: 979–983.
7. 7 Babbs CF, Paris RL Tacker WA Jr, et al. Effects of myocardial infarction on catheter defibrillation threshold. Med Instrum 1983 ; 17: 18–20.
8. 8 Tacker WA Jr, Geddes LA, Cabler PS, et al. Electrical threshold for defibrillation of canine ventricles following myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1974 ; 88: 476–481.
9. 9 Ruffy R, Schwartz DJ, Heib BR. Influence of acute coronary artery occlusion on direct ventricular defibrillation in dogs. Med Instrum 1980 ; 14: 23–26.
10. 10 Kerber RE, Pandian NG, Hoyt R, et al. Effect of ischemia, hypertrophy, hypoxia, acidosis and alkalosis on canine defibrillation. Am J Physiol 1983 ; 244: H825–H831.
11. 11 Fleet WF, Johnson TA, Graebner CA, et al. Effect of serial brief ischemic episodes on extracellular K+, pH, and activation in the pig. Circulaion 1985 ; 72: 922–932.
12. 12 Hiramatsu Y, Buchanan JW Jr, Knisley SB, et al. Influence of rate‐dependent cellular uncoupling on conduction change during simulated ischemia in guinea pig papillary muscles: Effect of verapamil. Circ Res 1989 ; 65: 95–102.
13. 13 Knisley SB, Hollev LK. Characterization of shock‐induced action potential extension during acute regional ischemia in rabbit hearts. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995 ; 6: 775–785.
14. 14 Knisley SB, Blitchington TF, Hill BC, et al. Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. Circ Res 1993 ; 68: 1761–1767.
15. 15 Swartz JF, Jones JL, Jones RE, et al. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation waveforms. Circ Res 1991 ; 68: 438–449.
16. 16 Knisley SB, Hill B, Ideker RE. Virtual electrode effects in myocardial fibres. Biophys J 1994 ; 66: 719–728.
17. 17 Tovar OH, Jones JL. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock‐induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities. Circ Res 1995 ; 77: 430–480.