Comparative psychophysical evaluation in cochlear implantation: Electrical and magnetic stimulation

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 39-43

  Chen, Joseph ^a,b   Hanusaik, Linda ^a   Ramses, Paul ^a   Schipp, David ^a   Anderson, Jennifer ^a   McLean, Arline ^a   Nedzelski, Julian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

cochlear implant; electrical stimulation; magnetic stimulation; psychophysical testing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0031016225     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Schipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear implant candidates. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:1-5.
2. Schipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Round window versus promontory stimulation: assessment for cochlear implant candidacy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:889-92.
3. Kileney PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kemink JL. A comparison of round window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates. Ear Hear 1992;13:294-9.
4. Shallop JK. Objective electrophysiologic measures from cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1993;14:58-63.
5. Battmer RD Laszig R, Lehnhardt E. Electrically elicited stape-dial reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1990; 11:370-4.
6. Kileney PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Telian SA. Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1083-90.
7. Hodges AV, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Balkany TJ. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1093-9.
8. Spies TH, Snik FM, Mens LHM, van den Broek P. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection - the use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993;113:579-84.
9. Counter SA, Borg E. Sound perception induced by extracranial magnetic stimulation in deaf patients. Scand Audiol 1992;21: 239-43.
10. Counter SA, Borg E, Bredberg G, Linde G, Vainio M. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system of deaf patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994;114:501-9.
11. Rubinstein JT. Analytical theory of extracellular electrical stimulation of nerve with focal electrodes-passive myelinated axon Biophys J 1991;60:538-55.
12. Schipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic indicators of speech performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (in press, 1995).
13. Parkin JL, Stewart BE, Dankowski K, Haas LJ. Prognosticating speech performance in multichannel cochlear implant recipients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;101:314-9.
14. Blamey PJ, Byman BC, Gordon M, et al. Factors predicting post-operative sentence scores in postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:342-8.