Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 50-57

  Myszka, David G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOSENSOR; KINETICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0031014046     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80157-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. 1. Jönsson U, Fägerstam L, Ivarsson B, Johnsson B, Karlsson R, Lundh K, Löfås S, Persson B, Roos H, Rönnberg I et al.: Realtime biospecific interaction analysis using surface plasmon resonance and a sensor chip technology. Biotechniques 1991, 11:620-627.
2. 2. Malmqvist M: Surface plasmon resonance for detection and measurement of antibody-antigen affinity and kinetics. Curr Opin Immunol 1993, 5:282-286.
3. 3. O'Shannessy DJ: Determination of kinetic rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions: a critique of the surface plasmon resonance literature. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1994, 5:65-71.
4. 4. Fisher RJ, Fivash M: Surface plasmon resonance based methods for measuring the kinetics and binding affinities of biomolecular interactions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1994, 5:389-395.
5. 5. Szabo A, Stolz L, Granzow R: Surface plasmon resonance and its use in biomolecular interaction analysis (BIA). Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:699-705.
6. 6. Margulies DH, Plaksin D, Khilko S, Jelonek MT: Studying interactions involving the T-cell antigen receptor by surface plasmon resonance. Curr Opin Immunol 1996, 8:262-270.
7. 7. Van der Merwe PA, Barclay AN: Analysis of cell-adhesion molecule interactions using surface plasmon resonance. Curr Opin Immunol 1996, 8:257-261.
8. 8. Saunal H, Van Regenmortel MH: Kinetic and functional mapping of viral epitopes using biosensor technology. Virology 1995, 213:462-471. This study illustrates the advantages of using BIAcore® to locate conformational epitopes.
9. 9. Van der Merwe PA, Crocker PR, Vinson M, Barclay AN, Schauer R, Kelm S: Localization of the putative sialic acid-binding site on the immunoglobulin superfamily cell-surface molecule CD22. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:9273-9280. A good example of using the sensor to screen through mutant proteins in order to identify binding sites.
10. 10. Dallmann HG, McHenry CS: DnaX complex of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:29563-29569. The authors use BIAcore® to demonstrate the subunits required to assemble large multiprotein complexes.
11. 11. Olson MW, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS: DnaX complex of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:29570-29577. Characterize the stoichiometry of complexes using sedimentation equilibrium studies in combination with SPR analysis.
12. 12. Lackmann M, Bucci T, Mann RJ, Kravets LA, Viney E, Smith F, Moritz RL, Carter W, Simpson RJ, Nicola NA et al.: Purification of a ligand for the EPH-like receptor HEK using a biosensor-based affinity detection approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:2523-2527. Demonstrates the benefits of using SPR biosensor technology in ligand purification.
13. 13. Stenberg E, Persson B, Roos H, Urbaniczky C: Quantitative determination of surface concentration of protein with surface plasmon resonance by using radiolabeled proteins. J Colloid Interface Sci 1991, 143:513-526.
14. 14. Sjölander S, Urbaniczky C: Integrated fluid handling system for biomolecular interaction analysis. Anal Chem 1991, 63:2338-2345.
15. 15. Löfås S, Johnsson BJ: A novel hydrogel matrix on gold surfaces in surface plasmon resonance sensors for fast and efficient covalent immobilization of ligands. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1990, 121:1526-1528.
16. 16. Johnsson B, Löfås S: Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance. Anal Biochem 1991, 198:268-277.
17. 17. Plant AL, Brigham-Burke M, Petrella EC, O'Shannessy DJ: Phospholipid/alkanethiol bilayers for cell-surface receptor studies by surface plasmon resonance. Anal Biochem 1995, 226:342-348.
18. 18. Kuziemko GM, Stroh M, Stevens RC: Cholera toxin binding affinity and specificity for gangliosides determined by surface plasmon resonance. Biochem 1996, 35:6375-6384. An example of using synthetic membranes with BIAcore® to characterize binding events that occur at the cell surface.
19. 19. Casasnovas JM, Springer TA: Kinetics and thermodynamics of virus binding to receptor. Studies with rhinovirus, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and surface plasmon resonance. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:13216-13224.
20. 20. Karlsson R, Stahlberg R: Surface plasmon resonance detection and multispot sensing for direct monitoring of interactions involving low-molecular-weight analytes and for determination of low affinities. Anal Biochem 1995, 228:274-280.
21. 21. Karlsson R: Real-time competitive kinetic analysis of interactions between low-molecular-weight ligands in solution and surface-immobilized receptors. Anal Biochem 1994, 221:142-151.
22. 22. Roden LD, Myszka DG: Global analysis of a macromolecular interaction measured on BIAcore®. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996, 225:1073-1077. This paper demonstrates that an antigen-antibody interaction measured on BIAcore® 2000 could be described by a simple bimolecular interaction mechanism. Therefore, effects related to the sensor surface, such as mass transport and the dextran matrix, did not complicate the observed binding responses.
23. 23. Karlsson R, Falt A: Experimental design for improved kinetic analysis of protein protein interactions with surface plasmon resonance biosensors. J Immunol Methods 1996, in press. This is an excellent paper that presents the experimental conditions required to performed a detailed kinetic analysis. Using global analysis, the authors demonstrated that one antigen-antibody reaction was described by a simple interaction model, but a second reaction required additional sensor experiments to discriminate between complex binding models. They also showed experimentally that no binding artifacts were associated with the dextran matrix.
24. 24. O'Shannessy D, Winzor DJ: Interpretation of deviations from pseudo-first-order kinetic behavior in the characterization of ligand binding by biosensor technology. Anal Biochem 1996, 236:275-283.
25. 25. Karlsson R, Roos H, Fagerstam L, Persson B: Kinetic and concentration analysis using BIA technology. Methods 1994, 6:99-110.
26. 26. Glaser RW: Antigen-antibody binding and mass transport by convection and diffusion to a surface: a two-dimensional computer model of binding and dissociation kinetics. Anal Biochem 1993, 213:152-161.
27. 27. Kalinin NL, Ward LD, Winzor DJ: Effects of solute multivalence on the evaluation of binding constants by biosensor technology: studies with concanavalin A and interleukin-6 as partitioning proteins. Anal Biochem 1995, 228:238-244.
28. 28. MacKenzie CR, Hirama T, Deng SJ, Bundle DR, Narang SA, Young NM: Analysis by surface plasmon resonance of the influence of valence on the ligand binding affinity and kinetics of an anti-carbohydrate antibody. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:1527-1533.
29. 29. Karlsson R, Mo JA, Holmdahl R: Binding of autoreactive mouse anti-type II collagen antibodies derived from the primary and the secondary immune response investigated with the biosensor technique. J Immunol Methods 1995, 188:63-71.
30. 30. Nieba L, Krebber A, Plückthun A: Competition BIAcore® for measuring true affinities: large differences from values determined from binding kinetics. Anal Biochem 1996, 234:155-165.
31. 31. Ladbury JE, Lemmon MA, Zhou M, Green J, Botfield MC, Schlessinger J: Measurement of the binding of tyrosyl phosphopeptides to SH2 domains: a reappraisal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:3199-3203.
32. 32. Hensley P: Defining the structure and stability of macromolecular assemblies in solution: the reemergence of analytical ultracentrifugation as a practical tool. Curr Biol 1996, 4:367-373.
33. 33. Dall'Acqua W, Goldman ER, Eisenstein E, Mariuzza RA: A mutational analysis of the binding of two different proteins to the same antibody. Biochemistry 1996, 35:9667-9676.
34. 34. Brown PM, Tagari P, Rowan KR, Yu VL, O'Neill GP, Middaugh CR, Sanyal G, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Nicholson DW: Epitope-labeled soluble human interleukin-5 (IL-5) receptors. Affinity cross-link labeling, IL-5 binding, and biological activity. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:29236-29243.
35. 35. Malchiodi EL, Eisenstein E, Fields BA, Ohlendorf DH, Schlievert PM, Karjalainen K, Mariuzza RA: Superantigen binding to a T cell receptor beta chain of known three-dimensional structure. J Exp Med 1995, 182:1833-1845.
36. 36. Myszka DG, Arulanantham PG, Sana T, Wu Z, Morton TA, Ciardelli TL: Kinetic analysis of ligand binding to Interleukin-2 receptor complexes created on an optical biosensor surface. Protein Sci 1996, 5:2468-2478. Replicated and randomized injections showed the high reproducibility of BIAcore®, even when the binding capacity was very low. Global analysis was used to determine the binding mechanism for the formation of a higher affinity complex observed on mixed receptor surfaces.
37. 37. Myszka DG, Morton TA, Doyle ML, Chaiken IM: Kinetic analysis of a protein antigen antibody interaction limited by mass transport on an optical biosensor. Biophys Chem 1996, in press. Demonstrates the advantages of globally analyzing data collected across multiple surface densities. The incorporation of a mass-transport step into the binding model extends the ability to interpret reaction rate constants where transport contributes to but does not dominate the reaction.
38. 38. Gershon PD, Khilko S: Stable chelating linkage for reverse immobilization of oligohistidine tagged proteins in the BIAcore surface plasmon resonance detector. J Immunol Methods 1995, 183:65-76.
39. 39. Cheskis B, Freedman LP: Modulation of nuclear receptor interactions by ligands: kinetic analysis using surface plasmon resonance. Biochemistry 1996, 35:3309-3318.
40. 40. Fisher RJ, Fivash M, Casas-Finet J, Bladen S, McNitt KL: Realtime BIAcore measurements of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein to polydeoxythymidylic acid reveal single-state kinetics with cooperativity. Methods 1994, 6:121-133.
41. 41. Karlsson R, Michaelsson A, Mattsson L: Kinetic analysis of monoclonal antibody-antigen interactions with a new biosensor based analytical system. J Immunol Methods 1991, 145:229-240.
42. 42. O'Shannessy D, Brigham-Burke M, Soneson KK, Hensley P, Brooks I: Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. Anal Biochem 1993, 212:457-468.
43. 43. Heding A, Gill R, Ogawa Y, De Meyts P, Shymko RM: Biosensor measurement of the binding of insulin-like growth factors I and II and their analogues to the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:13948-13952.
44. 2+ concentration, heparin, and activated protein C-catalyzed proteolysis. Biochem 1995, 34:12775-12781.
45. 45. Gertler A, Grosclaude J, Strasburger CJ, Nir S, Djiane J: Realtime kinetic measurements of the interactions between lactogenic hormones and prolactin-receptor extracellular domains from several species support the model of hormone-induced transient receptor dimerization. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:24482-24491.
46. 46. Masson L, Lu YJ, Mazza A, Brousseau R, Adang MJ: The CryIA(c) receptor purified from Manduca sexta displays multiple specificities. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:20309-20315.
47. 47. Edlund M, Blikstad I, Obrink B: Calmodulin binds to specific sequences in the cytoplasmic domain of C-CAM and down-regulates C-CAM self-association. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:1393-1399.
48. 48. Raghavan M, Wang Y, Bjorkman PJ: Effects of receptor dimerization on the interaction between the class I major histocompatibility complex-related Fc receptor and IgG. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:11200-11204.
49. 49. Raghavan M, Bonagura VR, Morrison SL, Bjorkman PJ: Analysis of the pH dependence of the neonatal Fc receptor/immunoglobulin G interaction using antibody and receptor variants. Biochemistry 1995, 34:1649-1657.
50. 50. Sasaki T, Gohring W, Pan TC, Chu ML, Timpl R: Binding of mouse and human fibulin-2 to extracellular matrix ligands. J Mol Biol 1995, 254:892-899.
51. 51. Morton TA, Myszka DG, Chaiken IM: Interpreting complex binding kinetics from optical biosensors: a comparison of analysis by linearization, the integrated rate equation, and numerical integration. Anal Biochem 1995, 227:176-185.
52. 52. Fisher RJ, Fivash M, Casas-Finet J, Erickson JW, Kondoh A, Bladen SV, Fisher C, Watson DK, Papas T: Real-time DNA binding measurements of the ETS1 recombinant oncoproteins reveal significant kinetic differences between the p42 and p51 isoforms. Protein Sci 1994, 3:257-266.
53. 53. Doyle ML, Myszka DG, Chaiken IM: Molecular interaction analysis in ligand design using mass transport, kinetic and themodynamic methods. J Mol Recognit 1996, 9:65-74.
54. 54. Wu Z, Johnson KW, Choi Y, Ciardelli TL: Ligand binding analysis of soluble interleukin-2 receptor complexes by surface plasmon resonance. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:16045-16051.
55. 55. Balasubramanian S, Chernov-Rogan T, Davis AM, Whitehorn E, Tate E, Bell MP, Zurawski G, Barrett RW: Ligand binding kinetics of IL-2 and IL-15 to heteromers formed by extracellular domains of the three IL-2 receptor subunits. Int Immunol 1995, 7:1839-1849.
56. 56. Schuck P: Kinetics of ligand binding to receptor immobilized in a polymer matrix, as detected with an evanescent wave biosensor. I. A computer simulation of the influence of mass transport. Biophys J 1996, 70:1230-1249.