The grouping problem in forensic glass analysis: A divisive approach

Forensic Science International

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-14

  Triggs, Christopher M ^a   Curran, James M ^a   Buckleton, John S ^b   Kevan, A J Walsh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b ESR: Forensic   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Agglomerative; Divisive; Glass; Grouping

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ARTICLE; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0031013783     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(96)02037-3     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. I.W. Evett and J.S. Buckleton, The interpretation of glass evidence. A practical approach. J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 30 (1990) 215-223.
2. K.A.J. Walsh, C.M. Triggs and J.S. Buckleton, A practical example of the interpretation of glass evidence. Science & Justice, 36 (1996) 213-218.
3. C.M. Triggs and J.M. Curran, A Divisive Approach to the Grouping Problem in Forensic Glass Analysis. Technical report STAT9502, Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, 1995.
4. A.J. Scott and M. Knott, A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 30 (1974) 507-512.
5. I.W. Evett and J.A. Lambert, The interpretation of refractive index measurements III. Forensic Sci. Int., 20 (1982) 237-245.
6. I.W. Evett, The interpretation of refractive index measurements II. Forensic Sci. Int., 12 (1978) 37-47.
7. H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability, 3rd edn., Oxford University Press, London, 1961, p. 100.