The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring with a group contingency on quiz performance in vocabulary with seventh-and eighth-grade students

Behavioral Interventions

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 27-40

  Malone, Retta A ^a   McLaughlin, T F ^a  

^a GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PERFORMANCE; TEACHING;

EID: 0031012938     PISSN: 10720847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(199701)12:1<27::AID-BIN165>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bolich, B. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1994). Peer tutoring as an effective teaching strategy for students with behavior disorders. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 18, 280-295.
2. Cline, J. D., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1994). An analysis of two peer tutoring models for spelling performance with at-risk elementary school students. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 18, 1-13.
3. Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535-542.
4. Dineen, J. P., Clark, H. B., & Risley, T. R. (1977). Peer tutoring among elementary students: Education to the tutor. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 231-238.
5. Durrer, B., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1994). The use of peer tutoring interventions involving students with behavior disorders. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 18, 272-279.
6. Ehly, S. H. (1990). The present and future of peer tutoring: Some implications for special educators. Techniques, 3, 205-213.
7. Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331-339.
8. Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., & Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 309.
9. Franca, V. M., Kerr, M. M., Reitz, A. L., & Lambert, D. (1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 109-128.
10. Greenwood, C. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at risk versus non risk students. Exceptional Children, 17, 521-535.
11. Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Bailey, V., Carta, J., Dorsey, D., Kohler, F. W., Nelson, C., Rotholz, D., & Schulte, D. (1987). Field replication of reciprocal peer tutoring. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 151-160.
12. Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., Walker, D. (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 213-233). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Finney, R. (1992). The classwide peer tutoring program: Implementation factors moderating students' achievement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 101-116.
14. Hogan, S., & Prater, M. A. (1993). The effects of peer tutoring and self-management training on on-task, academic and disruptive behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 118-128.
15. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single case experimental designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford.
16. Kohler, F. W., & Greenwood, C. R. (1990). Effects of collateral peer supportive behaviors within the reciprocal peer tutoring program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 307-322.
17. Maheady, L., & Harper, G. F. (1987). A reciprocal peer tutoring program to improve the spelling test performance of low-income, third- and fourth-grade students. Education and Treatment of Children. 10, 120-133.
18. Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., & Winstanley, N. (1991). Training and implementation requirements associated with the use of a reciprocal peer tutoring system. Education and Treatment of Children. 14, 177-198.
19. Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. G. (1988). Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55, 52-59.
20. Miller A. D., Barbetta, P. M., & Heron, T. E. (1994). START tutoring: Designing training, implementing, adapting, and evaluating tutoring programs for school and home settings. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshelman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 265-282). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21. Muirhead, W. M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1990). The effects of a peer-tutoring spelling game on academic performance and student attitudes. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 12, 1-9.
22. Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., Heggie, D. L. & Clement, P. W. (1984). A student-administered group-oriented contingency intervention: Its efficacy in a regular classroom. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 6(4), 41-56.
23. Piggot, H. E., & Heggie, D. L. (1985/86). Interpreting the conflicting results of individual versus group contingencies in classroom: The targeted behavior as a mediating variable. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 7(4), 1-16.
24. Polirstok, S. R., & Greer, R. D. (1986). A replication of collateral effects and a component of a successful tutoring package for inner-city adolescents. Education and Treatment of Children, 9, 101-121.
25. Rekrut, M. D. (1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. Journal of Reading, 37, 356-361.
26. Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Wagner, P., & Sternlicht, M. (1975). Retarded persons as "teachers": Retarded adolescents tutoring retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 6, 674-679.
28. Wolfe, J. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Wolfe, P. K. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer management and group contingencies on the arithmetic proficiency of underachieving students. Behavior Therapy, 17, 253-265.