Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp.)

Weed Science

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 229-233

  Santos, Bielinski M ^a   Bewick, Thomas A ^a   Stall, William M ^a   Shilling, Donn G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

CYPES; CYPRO; nutsedge competition; relative yield; relative yield total; Replacement series; tomato competitiveness

Indexed keywords

CYPERUS; CYPERUS ESCULENTUS; CYPERUS ROTUNDUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0031011951     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500092766     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and intetptetation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5:664-673.
2. de Wit, C. T. 1960. On Competition. Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. 66:1-82.
3. Hall, R. L. 1974. Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. I. Concepts and extension of the de Wit analysis to examine effects. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 25:739-747.
4. Holm, L. G., D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: Krieger. pp. 8, 125.
5. Jolliffe, P. A., A. N. Minjas, and V. C. Runeckles. 1984. A reinterpretation of yield relationship in replacement series experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 21:227-243.
6. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190-198.
7. Radosevich, S. R. 1988. Methods to study crop and weed interactions. In M. A. Altieri and M. Liebman, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 121-143.
8. Rejmanek, M., G. R. Robinson, and E. Rejmankova. 1989. Weed-crop competition: experimental designs and models for data analysis. Weed Sci. 37:276-284.
9. Roush, M. L., S. R. Radosevich, R. G. Wagner, B. D. Maxwell and T. D. Petersen. 1989. A comparison of methods for measuring effects of density and proportion in plant competition experiments. Weed Sci. 37:268-275.
10. Santos, B. M. 1995. Intra-and interspecific competitive interactions of nutsedges and tomato. Master's thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. pp. 25-27.
11. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. SAS Procedures Guide. Version 6. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, pp. 125-154.
12. Stall, W. M., J. A. Dusky, and J. P. Gilreath. 1994. Estimated effectiveness of recommended herbicides on selected common weeds in Florida vegetables. In D. Colvin, et al. 1994 Florida Weed Control Guide. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, pp. 343-346.
13. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994a. Vegetables 1993 summary. National Agricultural Statistic Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 10 p.
14. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994b. Vegetable summary. Florida agricultural statistics. Orlando, FL: U.S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 4-5.
15. William, R. D. and G. F. Warren. 1975. Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci. 23:317-323.
16. Wills, G. D. 1987. Description of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:2-9.