EUR-ASSESS project subgroup report on coverage

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 287-332

  Cranovsky, Richard ^a   Matillon, Yves ^b   Banta, David ^c  

^a Swiss Medical Association   (Switzerland)

^b Natl Agy the Devmt of Med Eval   (France)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

EID: 0031010607     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462300010382     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Abel-Smith, B. Value for money in health services: A comparative study. London: Heineman, 1976.
2. Academisch Ziekenhuis Nijmegen. Cochlear Implants. Eindverslag project ontwikkelings-geneeskunde 1988-1990. Sint Radboudziekenhuis, Nijmegen and Instituut voor Doven, Sint-Michielsbestel. Publikatienummer: IvD/R&D/9104/01. August 1991.
3. Academish Ziekenhuis Utrecht, Academisch Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Instituut voor Doven, St. Michielsgestel. Eindsverslag Cochleaire Implantatie bij Volwassenen OG91/010. February 1995.
4. Agence Nationale pour le Développement de l'Evaluation Médicale (ANDEM). L'implant cochleaire chex l'enfant sourd prelingual. Paris, September 1994.
5. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS). Implantes cocleares. Penel de expertes. Madrid, June 1995.
6. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures. Guidelines and indications for coronary bypass surgery. Circulation, 1991, 83, 1125-73.
7. Anonymous. Call for EU definition of "innovation." SCRIP, 1996, 2106, 4.
8. Bangemann Commissioner. Joint answer to written questions no. 2368/92, 2370/92 given by Mr. Bangemann on behalf of the Commission. 26 November 1992.
9. Banta, H. D., Oortwijn, W. J., & van Beekum, W. T. The organization of health care technology assessment in the Netherlands. The Hague: The Rathanau Institute, 1995.
10. Banta, H. D., & Saxe, L. Reimbursement for psychotherapy: Linking efficacy research and public policy-making. American Psychologist, 1983, 38, 918-23.
11. Battista, R., Banta, H. D., Jonsson, E., et al. Lessons from the eight countries. Health Policy, 1994, 30, 397-422.
12. Bos, M. Health care technology in the Netherlands. Health Policy, 1994, 30, 207-56.
13. Bos, M., Sampietro-Colom, L., Schilling, J. (eds.). EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup on Coverage. Technology assessment and coverage policy: The case of invasive cardiology therapy in five European countries. Unpublished background document. Barcelona and Zurich, 1996.
14. Brown, R., & Luce, B. Technology assessment in decision making by health care providers and payers. Washington, DC: Battelle Medical Technology Assessment and Policy Research Center, 1992.
15. Bunker, J., Fowles, J., & Schaffarzick, R. Evaluation of medical technologies strategies: Effects of coverage and reimbursement. New England Journal of Medicine, 1982, 306, 620-24.