Calculation of octanol/water partition coefficients (logP) using artificial neural networks and connection matrices

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 224-230

  Schaper, Klaus Jürgen ^a   Samitier, Maria Luisa Rosado ^a,b  

^a RESEARCH CENTER BORSTEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Calculation; Connection matrix; LogP; Neural network; Octanol; Partition coefficient; Water

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; MOLECULES;

CONNECTION MATRIX; LOGP; MOLECULAR FEATURE; NETWORK MATRICES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; OCTANOL; OCTANOL-WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT; ORGANIC MOLECULES; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; THREE-LAYER;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

HALOGEN; OCTANOL; WATER;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATOM; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; LIPOPHILICITY; NERVE CELL; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031008762     PISSN: 09318771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.19970160306     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Seydel, J.K. and Schaper, K.-J., Chemische Struktur und biologische Aktivität von Wirkstoffen; Methoden der Quantitativen Struktur-Wirkung-Analyse. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1979.
2. Van de Waterbeemd, H. and Mannhold, R. in: Pliška, V., Testa, B. and Van de Waterbeemd, H. (Eds.), Lipophilicity in Drug Action, VCH, Weinheim 1996, pp. 401-418.
3. Mannhold, R. and Dross, K., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 15, 403-409 (1996).
4. Elrod, D.W., Maggiora, G.M. and Trenary, G.T., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 30, 477-484 (1990).
5. Elrod, D.W., Maggiora, G.M. and Trenary, G.T., Tetrahedron Computer Methodol. 3, 163-174 (1990).
6. Kvasnicka, V., J. Math. Chem. 6, 63-79 (1991).
7. Kvasnicka, V. and Pospichal, J., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 235, 227-242 (1991).
8. Battersby, P., Dean, J.R., Hitchen, S.M., Tomlinson, W.R. and Myers, P., LC-GC INT. 6, 428-431 (1993).
9. Baskin, I.I., Palyulin, V.A. and Zefirov, N.S., Dokl. Akad. Nauk (russ.) 333, 176-179 (1993).
10. Smits, J.R.M., Melssen, W.J., Daalmans, G.J. and Kateman, G., Comput. Chem. 18, 157-172 (1994).
11. Gakh, A.A., Gakh, E.G., Sumpter, B.G. and Noid, D.W., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34, 832-839 (1994).
12. Kireev, D.B., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 30, 175-180 (1995).
13. Baskin, I.I., Palyulin, V.A. and Zefirov, N.S., poster presented at the 11th Europ. Symp. on Quant. Structure-Activity Relationships: Computer-Assisted Lead Finding and Optimization, Sept. 1-6, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland.
14. Hansch, C., Leo, A. and Hoekman, D., Exploring QSAR; Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1995.
15. Zupan, J. and Gasteiger, J., Neural Networks for Chemists, VCH, Weinheim 1993.
16. Lynch, M.F., Harrison, J.M., Town, W.G. and Ash, J.E., Computer Handling of Chemical Structure Information, Elsevier, New York, 1971.
17. Morgan, H.L., J. Chem. Doc. 5, 107-113 (1965).
18. Moreau, G., Nouveau J. de Chimie 4, 17-22 (1980).
19. obs (r = 0.977, s = 0.279). This result is not unexpected as the basis of the KOWWIN method is a training set with more than 2300 compounds, whereas in this paper the training set consisted of only 268 molecules.
20. Meylan, W. and Howard, P., J. Pharm. Sci. 84, 83-92 (1995).
21. Dearden, J.C. and Bresnen, G.M., Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel. 7, 133-144 (1988).
22. Andrea, T.A. and Kalayeh, H., J. Med. Chem. 34, 2824-2836 (1991).
23. So, S.-S. and Richards, W.G., J. Med. Chem. 35, 3201-3207 (1992).
24. Livingstone, D.J. and Manallack, D.T., J. Med. Chem. 36, 1295-1297 (1993).
25. Livingstone, D.J., Ellis, D.D. and Manallack, D.T., J. Med. Chem. 37, 3758-3767 (1994).