Quality of life after knee arthroplasty. A randomized study of 3 designs in 42 patients, compared after 4 years

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 156-160

  Hilding, Maria B ^a,b   Bäckbro, Bengt ^a   Ryd, Leif ^b  

^a CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECTIVE NEUROSIS; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LEISURE; PAIN; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SLEEP DISORDER;

EID: 0031007504     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453679709003999     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Scand (Suppl 277) 1968: 1-71.
2. Albrektsson B E J, Herberts P. ICLH knee arthroplasty. A consecutive study of 108 knees with uncemented tibial component fixation. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3 (2): 145-56.
3. Amstutz H C, Thomas B J, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66 (2): 228-41.
4. Andersson G. Hip assessment: A comparison of nine different methods. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54 (4): 621-5.
5. Callaghan J J, Dysart S H, Savory C F, Hopkinson W J. Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72 (6): 1008-9.
6. Drake B G, Callahan C M, Dittus R S, Wright J G. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes, J Arthroplasty 1994; 9 (4): 409-17.
7. Ecker M L, Lotke P A, Windsor R E, Cella J P. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop 1987; 216: 151-8.
8. Ewald F C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 9-12.
9. Freeman M A R. Plante-Bordeneuve P. Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76 (3): 432-8.
10. Galante J. Editorial. The need for a standardized system for evaluating results of total hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985; 67 (4): 1357-64.
11. Gurtland J J. Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70 (9): 1357-64.
12. Hilding M B, Asplund S, Bäckbro B O, Ryd L. Alignment accuracy by two different instrumentation systems in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study of 45 patients. Am J Knee Surg 1993; 6 (4): 150-66.
13. Hilding M B, Yuan X, Ryd L. The stability of three different cementless tibial components. A randomized radiostereometric study in 45 knee arthroplasty patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (1): 21-7.
14. Hunt S M, Wiklund I. Cross-cultural variation in the weighting of health statements: a comparison of English and Swedish valuations. Health Policy 1987; 8: 227-35.
15. Hunt S M, McKenna S P, McEwen J, Backett E M, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980; 34: 281-6.
16. Huskisson E C. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127-31.
17. Insall J N, Ranawat C S, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1976; 58 (6): 754-65.
18. Insall J N, Dorr L D, Scott R D, Scott W N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 13-4.
19. Krismer M, Bauer R, Fischer M. Prediction of the final outcome of hip arthroplasty by measurement of migration. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) (Suppl II) 1995; 77: 163.
20. Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm B, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76 (6): 912-7.
21. Nilsson L T, Franzén H, Carlsson Å S, Önnerfalt R. Early radiographic loosening impairs the function of a total hip replacement. The Nottingham Health Profile of 49 patients at five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76 (2): 235-9.
22. Revill S I, Robinson J O, Rosen M, Hogg M I J. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191-8.
23. Rissanen P, Aro S, Slätis P, Sintonen H, Paavolainen P. Health and quality of life before and after hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (2): 169-75.
24. Ritter M A, Herbst S A, Keating E M, Faris P M. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76 (1): 60-5.
25. Ryd L. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophologrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 220) 1986; 57: 1-80.
26. Ryd L, Albrektsson B E J, Carlsson L, Herberts P. Lindstrand A, Regnér L, Dansgaard F, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) as a predictor of mechanical loosening. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (3): 377-83.
27. Ryd L, Kärrholm J, Ahlvin P. The Score Assessment Group. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (1): 41-5.
28. Scott J, Huskisson E C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175-84.
29. Walker P S, Mai S F, Cobb A G, Bentley G, Hua J. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. A study of cemented Charnley and Stanmore femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (5): 705-14.
30. Wiklund I, Romanus B. A comparison of quality of life hefore and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73 (5): 765-9.