Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 373-382

  Depicker, Ann ^a   Van Montagu, Marc ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOSINE; RNA;

GENE OVEREXPRESSION; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA TRANSLATION; SILENT GENE; TRANSGENE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

EID: 0031005267     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80010-5     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen R: Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 1990, 2:279-289.
2. Van der Krol AR, Mur LA, Beld M, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR: Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell 1990, 2:291-299.
3. Jorgensen R: Silencing of plant genes by homologous transgenes. AgBiotech News Inform 1992, 4:265N-273N.
4. Flavell RB: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:3490-3496.
5. Meins F Jr, Kunz C: Silencing of chitinase expression in transgenic plants: an autoregulated model. In Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants. Edited by Paszkowski J. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994:335-348.
6. Dougherty WG, Parks TD: Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new? Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995, 7:399-405.
7. •] discuss the aberrant RNA model, the threshold model, and the antisense model, which have been proposed to account for post-transcriptional gene silencing. The conclusion is that none of these models can accommodate all data. Therefore, either several mechanisms exist or the models require refinements. These reviews also elaborate on the association between post-transcriptional gene silencing and virus resistance.
8. ••].
9. Meyer P, Saedler H: Homology-dependent gene silencing in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1996, 47:23-48. This review places homology-dependent silencing, whether it occurs transcriptionally or post-transcriptionally, in a general perspective and highlights analogous phenomena in fungi, Drosophila and mammals. The review also discusses in detail the importance of chromatin states and epigenetic effects.
10. Stam M, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: The silence of genes in transgenic plants. Annu Botany 1997, 79:3-12. The review concentrates on the relationship and features common between transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing. It also discusses the possibility that RNA-DNA hybrids may be a good substrate for de novo methylation.
11. Matzke MA, Matzke AJM, Eggleston WB: Paramutation and transgene silencing: a common response to invasive DNA? Trends Plant Sci 1996, 1:382-388.
12. Martienssen R: Epigenetic phenomena: paramutation and gene silencing in plants. Curr Biol 1996, 6:810-813.
13. Bender J, Fink GR: Epigenetic control of an endogenous gene family is revealed by a novel blue fluorescent mutant of Arabidopsis. Cell 1995, 83:725-734.
14. Ye F, Signer ER: RIGS (repeat-induced gene silencing) in Arabidopsis is transcriptional and alters chromatin configuration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:10881-10886.
15. De Carvalho F, Gheysen G, Kushnir S, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Castresana C: Suppression of β-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. EMBO J 1992, 11:2595-2602.
16. Seymour GB, Fray RG, Hill P, Tucker GA: Down-regulation of two non-homologous endogenous tomato genes with a single chimaeric sense gene construct Plant Mol Biol 1993, 23:1-9.
17. Dehio C, Schell J: Identification of plant genetic loci involved in a posttranscriptional mechanism for meiotically reversible transgene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:5538-5542.
18. Ingelbrecht I, Van Houdt H, Van Montagu M, Depicker A: Posttranscriptional silencing of reporter transgenes in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:10502-10506.
19. Van Blokland R, Van der Geest N, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Transgene-mediated suppression of chalcone synthase expression in Petunia hybrida results from an increase in RNA turnover. Plant J 1994, 6:861-877.
20. Depicker A, Ingelbrecht I, Van Houdt H, De Loose M, Van Montagu M: Post-transcriptional reporter transgene silencing in transgenic tobacco. In Mechanisms and Applications of Gene Silencing. Edited by Grierson D, Lycett GW, Tucker GA. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 1996:71-84.
21. De Carvalho Niebel F, Frendo P, Van Montagu M, Comelissen M: Post-transcriptional cosuppression of β-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell 1995, 7:347-358.
22. Hamilton AJ, Brown S, Grierson D: Post-transcriptional gene silencing in tomato. In Mechanisms and Applications of Gene Silencing. Edited by Grierson D, Lycett GW, Tucker GA. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 1996:105-117.
23. Van Blokland R, Van der Geest N, De Lange P, Stam M, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Post-transcriptional suppression of chalcone synthase genes in Petunia hybrida and the accumulation of unspliced pre-mRNAs. In Mechanisms and Applications of Gene Silencing. Edited by Grierson D, Lycett GW, Tucker GA. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 1996:57-69.
24. Smith HA, Swaney SL, Parks TD, Wernsman EA, Dougherty WG: Transgenic plant virus resistance mediated by untranslatable sense RNAs: expression, regulation, and fate of nonessential RNAs. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1441-1453.
25. Mueller E, Gilbert J, Davenport G, Brigneti G, Baulcombe DC: Homology-dependent resistance: transgenic virus resistance in plants related to homology-dependent gene silencing. Plant J 1995, 7:1001-1013.
26. English JJ, Mueller E, Baulcombe DC: Suppression of virus accumulation in transgenic plants exhibiting silencing of nuclear genes. Plant Cell 1996, 8:179-188. The authors demonstrate convincingly that any homology of a viral genome with a silencing transgene, whether it is a viral gene or a plant gene, suppresses the replication of the virus. Also, the article is the first one to show that the 3′ part of the post-transcriptionally silenced gene is methylated more extensively than the 5′ part, suggesting that the process of transcription is involved in the generation of the silencing signal.
27. Pang S-Z, Jan F-J, Carney K, Stout J, Tricoli DM, Quemada HD, Gonsalves D: Post-transcriptional transgene silencing and consequent topovirus resistance in transgenic lettuce are affected by transgene dosage and plant development. Plant J 1996, 9:899-909.
28. Sijen T, Wellink J, Hiriart J-B, Van Kammen A: RNA-mediated virus resistance: role of repeated transgenes and delineation of targeted regions. Plant Cell 1996, 8:2277-2294. This interesting and well organized article contains results on different aspects of post-transcriptional gene silencing. Homology of the transgene to the 3′ part of the silenced genes produces more efficient silencing than does homology to the 5′ part to confer RNA-mediated virus resistance. 60 nucleotides of homology between the silenced transgenes and the target RNA are sufficient to mediate RNA degradation. The arrangement of the transgenes influences the strength of post-transcriptional gene silencing. Promoterless transgenes cannot induce virus resistance in transgenic plants. Last, but not least, virus-resistant lines all contain transgenes in which not the promoter but the transcribed region is methylated.
29. - or aberrant RNAs are locally elevated, RNA-RNA pairing would trigger degradation, resulting in specifically truncated products.
30. Goodwin J, Chapman K, Swaney S, Parks TD, Wemsman EA, Dougherty WG: Genetic and biochemical dissection of transgenic RNA-mediated virus resistance. Plant Cell 1996, 8:95-105. Careful genetic and molecular characterization of transgenic plant material allowed the demonstration that post-transcriptional gene silencing and virus resistance can be multigenic traits. The post-transcriptional gene silencing phenotype is either weak, intermediate, or pronounced and this is directly correlated with the number of transgene copies.
31. Boerjan W, Bauw G, Van Montagu M, Inzé D: Distinct phenotypes generated by overexpression and suppression of S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase reveal developmental patterns of gene silencing in tobacco. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1401-1414.
32. Hobbs SLA, Warkentin TD, DeLong CMO: Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol Biol 1993, 21:17-26.
33. Stam M, De Bruin R, Kenter S, Van der Hoorn RAL, Van Blokland R, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Post-transcriptional silencing of chalcone synthase in Petunia by inverted transgene repeats. Plant J 1997, in press. In addition to demonstrating that the presence of multimeric chs transgene loci correlates with post-transcriptional gene silencing, this paper also shows that somatic reversion of an offshoot of a transformant was associated with deletion of the chs locus.
34. Dorlhac de Borne F, Vincentz M, Chupeau Y, Vaucheret H: Co-suppression of nitrate reductase host genes and transgenes in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 1994, 243:613-621.
35. Vaucheret H, Palauqui J-C, Elmayan T, Moffatt B: Molecular and genetic analysis of nitrite reductase co-suppression in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 1995, 248:311-317.
36. Kunz C, Schöb H, Stam M, Kooter JM, Meins F Jr: Developmentally regulated silencing and reactivation of tobacco chitinase transgene expression. Plant J 1996, 10:437-450. The authors show that post-transcriptional silencing of chitinase gene expression on the one hand and resetting to high expression levels on the other hand both occur at specific stages in development. The switch appears to be associated with changes in the potential for expression of chitinase genes. Furthermore, the authors showed that, once silencing is established, the competence for silencing can persist in dormant as well as in actively growing and newly established shoot meristems.
37. Cogoni C, Irelan JT, Schumacher M, Schmidhauser TJ, Selker EU, Macino G: Transgene silencing of the al-1 gene in vegetative cells of Neurospora is mediated by a cytoplasmic effector and does not depend on DNA-DNA interactions or DNA methylation. EMBO J 1996, 15:3153-3163. The authors of this article describe the characteristics of quelling (homology-dependent post-transcriptional silencing) in Neurospora upon integration of multiple transgene copies. Remarkably, a strict unequivocal and direct correlation between the quelling phenotype and the production of an unexpected sense-oriented chimeric transcript from the silencing locus is observed. Nevertheless, intended expression of promoter-driven sense or antisense RNA did not increase quelling.
38. ••] has to take into account the fact that homologous endogenes are present.
39. Jorgensen RA, Cluster PD, English J, Que Q, Napoli CA: Chalcone synthase cosuppression phenotypes in petunia flowers: comparison of sense vs. antisense constructs and single-copy vs. complex T-DNA sequences. Plant Mol Biol 1996, 31:957-973. By comparing the effects of sense and antisense Chs constructs in a large number of Petunia transgenotes, only a small overlap was found in the spectrum of phenotypes that can be produced by a sense Chs transgene compared with those produced by an antisense Chs transgene. Furthermore, the work demonstrates that the primary determinants for specific cosuppression of the endogenes were repetitiveness and organization of the transgene.
40. Palauqui J-C, Vaucheret H: Field trial analysis of nitrate reductase co-suppression: a comparative study of 38 combinations of transgene loci. Plant Mol Biol 1995, 29:149-159.
41. Mittelsten Scheid O, Jakovleva L, Afsar K, Maluszynska J, Paszkowski J: A change of ploidy can modify epigenetic silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:7114-7119.
42. Cluster PD, O'Dell M, Metzlaff M, Flavell RB: Details of T-DNA structural organization from a transgenic Petunia population exhibiting co-suppression. Plant Mol Biol 1996, 32:1197-1203.
43. De Neve M, De Buck S, Jacobs A, Van Montagu M, Depicker A: T-DNA integration patterns in co-transformed plant cells suggest that T-DNA repeats originate from co-integration of separate T-DNAs. Plant J 1997, 11:15-29.
44. Bollmann J, Carpenter R, Coen RS: Allelic interactions at the nivea locus of Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 1991, 3:1327-1336.
45. Todd JJ, Vodkin LO: Duplications that suppress and deletions that restore expression from a chalcone synthase multigene family. Plant Cell 1996, 8:687-699. The findings described in this paper demonstrate how rearrangements within a locus can affect the expression of a multigene family in an in trans-dominant manner.
46. Wassenegger M, Heimes S, Riedel L, Sänger HL: RNA-directed de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell 1994, 76:567-576.
47. Rothnie HM: Plant mRNA 3′-end formation. Plant Mol Biol 1996, 32:43-61.
48. Wolffe AP, Meric F: Coupling transcription to translation: a novel site for the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1996, 28:247-257.
49. Jacobs Anderson JS, Parker R: RNA turnover: the helicase story unwinds. Curr Biol 1996, 6:780-782.
50. Aoufouchi S, Yélamos J, Milstein C: Nonsense mutations inhibit RNA splicing in a cell-free system: recognition of mutant codon is independent of protein synthesis. Cell 1996, 85:415-422.
51. Caponigro G, Parker R: Mechanisms and control of mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 1996, 60:233-249.
52. Huang S, Spector DL: Intron-dependent recruitment of pre-mRNA splicing factors to sites of transcription. J Cell Biol 1996, 133:719-732.
53. Sheng J, Citovsky V: Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transport: have virulence proteins, will travel. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1699-1710.
54. Daniels GA, Lieber MR: RNA : DNA complex formation upon transcription of immunoglobin switch regions: implications for the mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23:5006-5011.
55. Adams RLP: Eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases - structure and function. Bioessays 1995, 17:139-145.
56. Hohn T, Corsten S, Rieke S, Müller M, Rothnie H: Methylation of coding region alone inhibits gene expression in plant protoplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:8334-8339.
57. Van Houdt H, Ingelbrecht I, Van Montagu M, Depicker A: Post-transcriptional silencing of a neomycin phosphotransferase II transgene correlates with the accumulation of unproductive RNAs and with increased cytosine methylation of 3′ flanking regions. Plant J 1997, in press.