The responsible referee

Biometrics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 715-719

  Finney, David J ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Editorial judgment; Ethics; Feedback

Indexed keywords

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

CONFIDENTIALITY; EDITORIAL JUDGMENT; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES;

BIOMETRICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031005216     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2533971     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Anonymous. (1995). Peer review guidelines: A working draft. CBE VIEWS 18, 79-81. [Council of Biological Editors Inc., 11 S. La Salle Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.]
2. Finney, D. J. (1995). Statistical science and effective scientific communication. Journal of Applied Statistics 22, 293-308.
3. Finney, D. J. and Harper, J. L. (1993). Editorial code for the presentation of statistical analyses. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 254, 287-288.
4. Gleser, L. J. (1986). Some notes on refereeing. The American Statistician 40, 310-312.
5. Lock, S. (1985). A Difficult Balance - Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. London, England: British Medical Journal.
6. McKenzie, S. (1995). Reviewing scientific papers. Archives of Disease in Childhood 72, 539-540.