Randomised trial of immediate versus deferred treatment strategies for the management of minor cervical cytological abnormalities

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 590-594

  Shafi, M I ^a   Luesley, D M ^a   Jordan, J A ^b   Dunn, J A ^c   Rollason, T P ^b   Yates, M ^b  

^a CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSKARYOSIS; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0031004821     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11538.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Farmery E, Gray M. Report of the First Five Years of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Oxford : National Co-ordinating Network, 1994.
2. Shafi MI, Soutter WP. Controversies in management: Management of women with mild dyskaryosis. BMJ 1994; 309: 590–592.
3. Duncan ID. NHS Cervical Screening Programme: Guidelines for Clinical Practice and Programme Management. Oxford : National Co-ordinating Network, 1992.
4. Shafi MI, Luesley DM, Jordan JA. Mild cervical cytological abnormalities. BMJ 1992; 305: 1040–1041.
5. Bolger BS, Lewis BV. A prospective study of colposcopy in women with mild dyskaryosis or koilocytosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 95:1117–1119.
6. Soutter WP, Wisdom S, Brough AK, Monaghan JM. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 70–74.
7. Giles JA, Deery A, Crow J, Walker P. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1067–1070.
8. Flannelly G, Anderson D, Kitchener HC, Mann EMF, Campbell M, Fisher P, Walker F, Templeton AA. Management of women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis. BMJ 1994; 308:399–403.
9. Shafi MI, Finn CB, Blomfield P, Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Jordan JA. Cervical cancer—need to look and recognise. Lancet 1991; 338: 388–389.
10. Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason TP. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: A potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 1273–1276.
11. Tidbury P, Singer A, Jenkins D. CIN 3: The role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 583–586.
12. Fletcher A. Dealing with the report of a mild dyskaryotic smear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 517–519.
13. Cuzick J, Terry G, Ho L, Hollingworth T, Anderson M. Human papil- lomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical smears as prediction of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 1992; 339:959–960.
14. Bavin PJ, Giles JA, Deery A, Crow J, Griffiths PD, Emery VC, Walker PG. Use of semi-quantitative PCR for human papillomavirus DNA type 16 to identify women with high grade cervical disease in a population presenting with a mild dyskaryotic report. Br J Cancer 1993; 67:602–605.
15. Downey GP, Bavin PJ, Deery ARS, Crow J, Griffiths PD, Emery VC, Walker PG. Relation between human papillomavirus type 16 and potential for progression of minor-grade cervical disease. Lancet 1994; 344:432–435.