Must the patient fast before intravascular injection of non-ionic contrast media? Results of a controlled study;Muss der Patient vor intravasaler Applikation eines nichtionischen Kontrastmittels nuchtern sein? Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten Untersuchung

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Neuen Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 166, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 370-375

  Wagner, H J ^a   Evers, J P ^b   Hoppe, M ^b   Klose, K J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

adverse reactions; contrast media; fasting

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPNEA; FEMALE; FLUSHING; FOOD DEPRIVATION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INJECTION PAIN; INTRAARTERIAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TACHYCARDIA; UROGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FASTING; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INJECTIONS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 0031004681     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Barrett, B. J., P. S. Parfrey, H. M Vasasour, F. O'Dea, G. Kent, E. Stone: A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 326 (1992) 431-436
2. Beyer-Enke, S. A., E. Zeitler, R. Schneider: Spätnebenwirkungen nach intravasaler Anwendung nicht-ionischer Röntgenkontrastmittel. Radiologe 32 (1992) 165-169
3. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte: Bekanntmachung über die Zulassung und Registrierung von Arzneimitteln: Monographie: Amidotrizoate. Bundesanzeiger 153 (1994) vom 16. 8. 1994
4. Expertengespräch Kontrastmittel: Empfehlungen der Expertenrunde. Radiologe 32 (1992) Supplement 1:15
5. Jacobsson, B. F., H. Jorulf, M. S. Kalantar, D. L. Narasimham: Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients. Radiology 167 (1988) 601-605
6. Katayama, H., K. Yamaguchi, T. Kozuka, T. Takashima, P. Seez, K. Matsuura: Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175 (1990) 621-628
7. Oowaki, K., H. Saigusa, H. Ojiri, M. Ariizumi, J. Yaagisi, K. Fukuda, S. Tada: Relationship between oral food intake and nausea caused by intravenous injection of iodinated contrast material. Nippon-Igaku-Hoshasen-Gakkai-Zasshi 54 (1994) 476-479
8. Palmer, F. J.: The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions final report. Australas Radiol. 32 (1988) 426-428
9. Solomon, R., C. Werner, D. Mann, J. D'Elia, P. Silva: Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide on acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents. New Engl. J. Med. 331 (1994) 1416-1420
10. Steinberg, E. P., R. D. Moore, N. R. Powe R. Gopalan, A. J. Davidoff, M. Litt, S. Graziano, J. A. Brinker: Safety and cost-effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. N. Engl. J. Med. 326 (1992) 425-430
11. Yoshiokawa, H.: Late adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. Radiology 183 (1992) 737-740
12. Wolf, G. L., R. L. Arenson, A. P. Cross: A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. Amer. J. Radiol. 152 (1989) 939-944