Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A review of current issues

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 368-379

  Young, Wendy ^a   Cohen, Marsha M ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

EID: 0031000211     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462300010424     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Adamson, D. A. A hospital review of advanced gynecologic endoscopic procedures [letter]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994, 170, 1641-42.
2. Alfirevic Z., & Neilson J. P. Laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy [letter]. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995, 102, 511.
3. Anonymous. ACOG committee opinion: Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Number 146, November 1994. Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1995, 48, 244.
4. Arbogast, J. D., Welch, R. A., Riza, E. D., et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to be an alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1994, 4, 185-90.