Autonomy and practice: The case of complementary practitioners in the United Kingdom

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 55-59

  Tovey, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

British Medical Association; Complementary medicine; Good practice; Intra sectoral differentiation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 0030998423     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/9.1.55     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Adams J, With Complements. Health Service Journal 105 5455, 23, 1995.
2. British Medical Association, Alternative Therapy. BMA, London, 1986.
3. Christie V E, A Dialogue between Practitioners of Alternative (Traditional) Medicine and Modern (Western) Medicine in Norway. Soc Sci Med 1991; 325: 549-552.
4. Sharma U, Complementary Medicine Today. Routledge, London, 1992.
5. British Medical Association, Complementary Medicine: New Approaches to Good Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.