Inaccurate reporting of simulated critical anaesthetic incidents

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 637-641

  Byrne, A J ^a   Jones, J G ^b  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia, audit; Anaesthetist, training; Computers, simulation; Model, computer simulation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANESTHESIA; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; BRONCHOSPASM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORD; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEACHING; VIDEOTAPE;

EID: 0030996076     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.6.637     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Byrne AJ, Hilton PJ, Lunn J. Basic simulations in anaesthesia. A pilot study of the ACCESS system. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 376-381.
2. Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
3. Groen GJ. Patel VL. Medical problem solving: some questionable assumptions. Medical Education 1985; 19: 95-100.
4. Miller GA. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 1956; 63: 81-97.
5. Dorner D. On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In: Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J, eds. New Technology and Human Error. Philadelphia: John Wiley and Sons, 1987; 97-109.
6. Bartlett FC. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
7. Allnut MF. Human factors in accidents. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1987; 59: 856-864.