Stentless valve replacement in the small aortic root

Vascular

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 229-234

  Walther, T ^a   Falk, V ^a   Diegeler, A ^a   Gummert, J ^a   Autschbach, R ^a   Mohr, F W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

echocardiography; small aortic root; stentless aortic valve aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA PROSTHESIS; AORTA ROOT; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0030993617     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096721099700500217     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barner H. B., Labovitz A. J., Fiore A. C., Prosthetic valves for the small aortic root. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1994, 9(Suppl 2), 154–157.
2. Craver J. M., King S. B., Douglas J. S., Franch R. H., Jones E. H., Morris D. C., Kopchak J., Hatcher C. R., Late hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock modified orifice aortic bioprosthesis. Circulation, 1979, 60(suppl), 1–93.
3. Chaux A. C., Gray R. J., Matiogg J. M., Feldman H., Sustaita H., An appreciation of the new St. Jude valvular prosthesis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1981, 81, 102.
4. Tatineni S., Barner H. B., Pearson H. B., Halbe D., Woodruff R., Labovitz A. J., Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular funbction. Circulation, 1989, 80(Suppl. 1), 1–6.
5. Bojar R. M., Diehl J. T., Moten M., Payne D. D., Rastegar H., Stetz J. J., Pandian N. G., Cleveland R. J., Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu—Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989, 98, 1087–1095.
6. Wiseth R., Levang O. W., Tangen G., Rein K. A., Skjaerpe T., Hatle L., Exercise hemodynamics in small ($21 mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. American Heart Journal, 1993, 125, 138–146.
7. Kirklin J. W., Barratt-Boyes B. G., Aortic valve disease. In Cardiac Surgery. 2nd edn, ed. Kirklin J. W., Barratt-Boyes B. G. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1993, pp. 554–555.
8. Sim E. K., Orszulak T. A., Schaff H. V., Shub C., Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 1994, 8, 293–297.
9. Rahimtoola S. H., The problem of valve prosthesis—patient mismatch. Circulation, 1978, 58, 20–24.
10. Roedler S., Moritz A., Wutte M., Hoda R., Wolner E., The CarboMedics “top hat” supraannular prosthesis in the small aortic root. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1995, 10, 198–204.
11. Jaffe W. M., Coverdale H. A., Roche A. H. G., Whitiock R. M. L., Barratt-Boyes B. G., Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20–23 mm allograft, Medtronic intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1990, 100, 167.
12. David T. E., Pollick C., Bos J., Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1990, 99, 113–118.
13. Drury P. J., Dobrin J., Bodnar E., Black M. M., Distribution of flexibility in the porcine aortic root and in cardiac support frames. In Biologic Bioprosthetic Valves, ed. Bodnar E., Yacoub M., Yorke Medical Books, New York, 1986, pp. 580–587.
14. Gross C., Harringer W., Mair R., Wimmer-Greinecker, G., Klima, U., Sihorsch, K., Hofmann, R., Beran, H. and Brucke, P., Aortic valve replacement: Is the stentless xenograft an alternative to the homograft? Early results of a randomized study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995, 60, S418-S421.
15. David T. E., Ropchan G. C., Butany J. W., Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1988, 3, 501–505.
16. David T. E., Bos J., Rakowski H., Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1992, 1, 244–248.
17. Del Rizzo D. F., Goldman B. S., Joyner C. P., Sever J., Fremes S. E., Christakis G. T., Initial clinical experience with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve™. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1994, 9, 379–385.
18. Sievers H. H., Lange P. E., Bernhard A., Implantation of a xenogenic stentless aortic bioprosthesis. First experience. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1985, 33, 225–226.
19. Konertz W., Herrmann M., Knauth M., Stabenow I., David T., Preliminary experience with the Toronto SPV stentless porcine bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1994, 42, 36–39.
20. David T. E., Feindel C. M., Bos J., Sun Z., Scully H. E., Rakowski H., Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine aortic valve. A six year experience. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1994, 108, 1030–1036.
21. Yoganathan A. P., Eberhardt C. E., Walker P. G., Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle™ aortic root bioprosthesis. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1994, 3, 571–580.
22. Westaby S., Amarasena N., Ormerod O., Amarasena C., Pillai R., Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995, 60, S422-S427.
23. Mohr F. W., Walther T., Baryalei M., Falk V., Autschbach R., Scheldt A., Dalichau H., The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: One year results in 100 patients. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995, 60, 171–175.
24. Walther T., Falk V., Autschbach R., Scheldt A., Baryalei M., Schindewolf K., Dalichau H., Mohr F. W., Hemodynamic assessment of the stentless Toronto SPV™ bioprosthesis by echocardiography. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1994, 3, 657–665.
25. Barratt-Boyes B. G., Christie G. W., What is the best bioprosthetic operation for the small aortic Allograft, Autograft, Porcine, Pericardial, Stented or Unstented?. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1994, 9(suppl.), 158–164.
26. Edmunds L. H., Clark R. E., Cohn L. H., Miller D. C., Weisel R. D., Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988, 46, 257–259.
27. Chambers J., Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper. British Heart Journal, 1994, 71, 6–14.
28. Sintek C. F., Fletcher A. D., Khonsari S., Stentless porcine aortic root: Valve of choice for the elderly patient with small aortic root? Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995, 109, 871–876.
29. Zabalgoitia M., Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic heart valves. Current Problems in Cardiology, 1992, 271–325.
30. Reisner S. A., Meltzer R. S., Normal values of prosthetic valve doppler echocardiographic parameters; a review. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 1988, 1, 201–210.
31. Liao Y., Cooper R. S., Mensah G. A., McGee D. L., Left ventricular hypertrophy has a greater impact on survival in women than in men. Circulation, 1995, 92, 805–810.
32. Aronow W. S., Diagnostic and prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy in elderly patients (editorial). Journal of Cardiovascular Diagnostic Procedures, 1994/1995, 12, 151–157.
33. Messerli F. H., Keteffiut R., Left ventricular hypertrophy: A pressure-independent cardiocascular risk factor. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1993, 22(Suppl. 1), S7-S13.
34. Carabello B. A., The relationship of left ventricular geometry and hypertrophy to left ventricular function in valvular heart disease. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1995, 4(Suppl. II), S132-S139.