A survey of how British obstetric anaesthetists test regional anaesthesia before Caesarean section

Anaesthesia

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 901-903

  Bourne, T M ^a   DeMelo, A E ^a   Bastianpillai, B A ^a   May, A E ^a  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia; obstetric; Anaesthetic techniques; regional

Indexed keywords

CHLOROETHANE;

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SENSATION; TEMPERATURE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0030991650     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.180-az0314.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aitkenhead AR. The pattern of litigation against anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994; 73: 10-21.
2. Covino BG, Scott DB. Handbook of Epidural Anaesthesia and Analgesia. London: Grune and Stratton, 1985.
3. May AE. Epidurals for Childbirth. Oxford University Press, 1994.
4. Russell IF. Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at Caesarean section under regional block. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1995; 4: 71-7.
5. Carrie LES. Spinal and/or epidural blockade for Caesarean section. In: Reynolds F, ed. Epidural and Spinal Blockade in Obstetrics. Bailliere Tindall, 1990.
6. Brull SJ, Greene NM. Zones of differential sensory block during extradural anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 66: 651-5.
7. Datta S. The Obstetric Anaesthetists Handbook. Mosby 1995.
8. Glosten B. Epidural and spinal anaesthesia/analgesia. In: Chestnut DH, ed. Obstetric Anesthesia, Principles and Practice. Mosby, 1994.
9. Ostheimer GW, Leavitt KA. Lumbar epidural anaesthesia. In: Ostheimer GW, ed. Manual of Obstetric Anaesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, 1992.
10. Shnider SM, Levinson G. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, 1994.