Lessons from perfusion surveys

Perfusion

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 221-227

  Kurusz, Mark ^a,b  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FILTER; METHODOLOGY; PERFUSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAFETY; SENSOR; TRAINING;

EID: 0030990461     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026765919701200403     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Ferber R, Sheatsley P, Turner A, Waksberg J. What is a survey? Washington, DC: American Statistical Association, 1980: 3.
2. Groom RC, Hill AG, Akl BF, Lefrak EA, Kurusz M. Pediatric perfusion survey. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1990; 11: 78-84.
3. Elliott M, Rao PV, Hampton M. Current paediatric perfusion practice in the UK. Perfusion 1993; 8: 7-25.
4. Anonymous. AmSECT perfusionists' survey. J Extra-Corpor Technol 1977; 9: 114-22.
5. Anonymous. Perfusion practice; a report on AmSECT's survey. Perfusion Life 1986; 3: 18-23.
6. Anonymous. Perfusion practice survey, September, 1993. Perfusion Life 1994; 11: 42-45.
7. Kurusz M. Perfusion manpower results. AmSECT Today 1996 (Feb); 17-20.
8. Stoney WS, Alford WC Jr, Burrus GR, Glassford DM Jr, Thomas CS Jr. Air embolism and other accidents using pump oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 29: 336-40.
9. Wheeldon DR. Can cardiopulmonary bypass be a safe procedure? Ch 27 In: Longmore DB ed. Towards safer cardiac surgery. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1981: 427-46.
10. Wheeldon DR. Safety during cardiopulmonary bypass. Proceedings first world congress on open heart technology. London: Franklin Scientific Projects, 1981: 27-29.
11. Miller DW Jr, Binford JM, Hessel EA II. Results of a survey of the professional activities of 811 cardiopulmonary perfusionists. J Tliorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83: 385-89.
12. Kurusz M, Schneider B, Brown JP, Conti VR. Filtration during open-heart surgery: devices, techniques, opinions and complications. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1983; 4: 123-29.
13. Kurusz M, Conti VR, Arens JF, Brown JP, Faulkner SC, Manning JV Jr. Perfusion accident survey. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1986; 7: 57-65.
14. Kurusz M, Wheeldon DR. Risk containment during cardiopulmonary bypass. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Stirg 1990; 2: 400-409.
15. Groom RC, Hill AG, Kurusz M et al. Paediatric perfusion practice in North America: an update. Perfusion 1995; 10: 393-401.
16. Dehnke C, Karlsson P-A. Current paediatric perfusion practice in Scandinavia. ScanMAG 1994; 3: 6-10.
17. Svenmarker S, Haggmark S, Jansson E, Benze S. Scandinavian cardiopulmonary bypass safety. ScanMAG 1991; 3: 19-21.
18. Patey R, Alston RP. Anaesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass: a UK and Ireland survey. Perfusion 1993; 8: 313-19.
19. Wajon PR, Walsh RG, Symons NLP. A survey of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion practices in Australia in 1992. Anatesh Intens Care 1993; 21: 814-21.
20. Cockroft S. Use of monitoring devices during anesthesia for cardiac surgery: a survey of practices at public hospitals within the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994; 8: 382-85.
21. Silvay G, Ammar T, Reich DL, Vela-Cantos F, Joffe D, Ergin AM. Cardiopulmonary bypass for adult patients: a survey of equipment and techniques. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 420-24.
22. Utley JR. San Diego Cardiopulmonary Bypass Symposium, 1995 survey, Centrifugal pumps. Cardiothoracic Research and Education Foundation, Patwphysiology and techniques of cardiopulmonary bypass, course syllabus, 1996.
23. Babbie ER. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1973.
24. Kalton G. Introduction to survey sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1983: 90.
25. Reuss CF. Differences between persons responding and not responding to a mailed questionnaire.Am Sociologic Rev 1943; 8: 433 -38.
26. Donald MN. Implications of nonresponse for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data. Publ Opinion Quart 1960; 24: 99-104.
27. Edgerton HA, Britt SH, Norman RD. Objective differences among various types of respondents to a mailed questionnaire. Am Sociologic Rev 1947; 12: 435-14.