Lower limb prosthetic considerations in persons with coagulopathies

Haemophilia

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 87-89

  Heim, M ^a,b   Azaria, M ^a,b   Heijnen, L ^c  

^a SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial limb usage; Coagulopathies

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; DISABLED PERSON; HEMARTHROSIS; HUMAN; LEG PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; WALKING AID;

EID: 0030989740     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1997.00052.x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. van der Meig WKN. No leg to stand on. Historical relation between amputation surgery and prostheseology. Thesis. Proost International Book Production, Turnhout, Belgium; 1995.
2. Lang RH. Limb reconstruction versus amputation decision making in massive lower extremity trauma. Clin Orthop, 1989, 243: 92-9.
3. Bruckner L. A standardized trans-tibial amputation method following chronic occlusive arterial disease. Pros Orthot Internat, 1992; 16: 157-62.
4. Lexier RR, Harrington IJ, Woods JM. Lower extremity amputations: a 5-year review and comparative study. Can J Surg, 1987, 30: 374-6.
5. Ellitsgaard N, Andersson A, Fabin J, Holstein P. Outcome in 282 lower extremity amputations. Acta Orthop Scand, 1990, 61: 140-2.
6. Gottschalk FA, Stills M. The bio-mechanics of trans-femoral amputation. Pros Orthot Int, 1994; 18: 12-7.
7. Sethi PK. Technological choices in prosthetics and orthotics for developing countries. Pros Orthot Internat, 1989; 13: 117-24.
8. Radcliffe CW. Four-bar linkage prosthetic knee mechanisms; kinometics, alignment and prescriptive criteria. Pros Orthot Internat, 1994; 18: 159-73.
9. Arya AP, Lees A, Nirula HC, Klenerman L. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Pros Orthot Internat, 1995; 19: 37-45.
10. Cluitmans J, Geboers M, Deckers, J, Rings F. Experiences with respect to the ICEROSS system for trans-tibial prostheses. Pros Orthot Internat, 1994; 18: 78-83.
11. Oberg T, Lilja M, Johansson T. Karsznia A. Clinical evaluation of transtibial prosthesis sockets; a comparison between CAD-CAM and conventionally produced sockets. Pros Orthot Internat, 1993; 17: 164-71.
12. Travis RP, Dewar ME. Computer aided socket design for trans-femoral amputees. Pros Orthot Internat, 1993, 17: 172-9.
13. Gailey RS, Lawrence D, Burditt C, Spyropoulos P, Newell C, Nash MS. The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket; a comparison of energy cost during ambulation. Pros Orthot Internat, 1993; 17: 95-100.
14. Pritham CH. Biomechanics and shape of the above-knee socket considered in light of the ischial containment concept. Pros Orthot Internat, 1990; 14: 9-21.