Urine flow cytometry as a tool to differentiate acute allograft rejection from other causes of acute renal graft dysfunction

Transplantation

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 731-734

  Roberti, Isabel ^a   Panico, Mary ^b   Reisman, Lewis ^a  

^a SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CD14 ANTIGEN; CD3 ANTIGEN; CREATININE; HLA DR ANTIGEN; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE 1; INTERLEUKIN 2 RECEPTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KIDNEY GRAFT; MALE; MICTURITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY TRACT DISEASE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; ANTIGENS, CD3; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GRAFT REJECTION; HLA-DR ANTIGENS; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE-1; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECEPTORS, INTERLEUKIN-2; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; URINE;

EID: 0030984437     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199709150-00012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beckingham IJ, Nicholson ML, Bell PR. Analysis of factors associated with complications following renal transplant needle biopsy. Br J Urol 1994; 73: 13.
2. Rush DN, Jeffery JR, Gough J. Sequential protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients: clinico-pathological correlations using the Banff schema. Transplantation 1995; 59: 511.
3. Burrows L, Knight R, Kupfer S, Panico M, Palearas A, Solomon M. The diagnostic accuracy of urine cytological analysis in the rapid assessment of acute allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 1044.
4. Simpson MA, Madras PN, Cornaby AJ, et al. Sequential determinations of urinary cytology and plasma and urinary lymphokines in the management of renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 1989; 47: 218.
5. Maury CPJ, Teppo AM. Serum immunoreactive interleukin 1 in renal transplants. Transplantation 1988; 45: 143.
6. Hotta O, Taguma Y, Yusa N, Ooyama M. Analysis of mononuclear cells in urine using flow cytometry in glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 1994; 46: S117.
7. + cells in urine using flow cytometry: a useful tool for monitoring disease activity of IgA nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 1993; 39: 289.
8. Roberti I, Reisman L, Burrows L, Lieberman KV. Urine cytology and urine flow cytometry in renal transplantation: a prospective double blind study. Transplantation 1995; 59: 495.
9. Roberti I, Panico M, Reisman L. Urine flow cytometry as a predictor of renal allograft function. Transplantation 1997; 63: 781.
10. Sibley RK, Snover DC. The use and interpretation of biopsies in the management of the post-transplant patient. In: Cerilli GJ, ed. Organ transplantation and replacement. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1993: 394.
11. Sorof JM, Vartanian RK, Olson JL, Tomlanovich SJ, Vincent FG, Amend WJC. Histological concordance of paired renal allograft biopsy cores. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1215.
12. Colvin RB. Pathology of renal allografts. In: Colvin RB, Bhan AK, McCluskey RT, eds. Diagnostic immunopathology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 329.
13. Curtis JJ, Julian BA, Sanders CE, Herrera GA, Gaston RS. Dilemmas in renal transplantation: when the clinical course and histological findings differ. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27: 435.
14. Woodle ES, Cronin D, Newell KA, et al. Tacrolimus therapy for refractory acute renal allograft rejection: definition of the histologic by protocol biopsies. Transplantation 1996; 62: 906.
15. Rush DN, Henry SF, Jeffery JR, et al. Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable allograft recipients. Transplantation 1994; 57: 208.
16. McWhinnie DL, Thompson JF, Taylor HM, et al. Morphometric analysis of cellular filtration assessed by monoclonal antibody labeling in sequential human renal allograft biopsies. Transplantation 1986; 2: 352.
17. Solez K, Racusen LC, Marcussen N, et al. Morphology of ischemic acute renal failure, normal function, and cyclosporine toxicity in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Kidney Int 1993; 43: 1058.
18. Bishop GA, Hall BM, Duggin GG, Horvath JS, Sheil AG, Tiller DJ. Immunopathology of renal allograft rejection analyses with monoclonal antibodies to mononuclear cell markers. Kidney Int 1986; 29: 708.
19. Brockmeyer C, Ulbrecht M, Schendel D, et al. Distribution of cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, ELAM-1) in renal tissue during allograft rejection. Transplantation 1993; 55: 610.
20. Copin MC, Hazzan M, Janin A, et al. Diagnostic and predictive value of an immunohistochemical profile in asymptomatic acute rejection of renal allografts. Transplant Immunol 1995; 3: 229.
21. Marcussen N, Schumann JL, Schumann JB, Parmar M, Kjellstrand C. Analysis of cytodiagnostic urinalysis findings in 77 patients with concurrent renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 1992; 20: 618.
22. Fuggle SV, McWhinnie DL, Morris DJ. Immunohistological analysis of renal allograft biopsies from cyclosporine-treated patients. Transpl Int 1989; 2: 123.
23. Duijvestijn AM, van Breda Vriesman PJ. Chronic allograft rejection: selective involvement of the glomerular endothelium in humoral reactivity and intravascular coagulation. Transplantation 1991; 52: 195.
24. Colvin RB. The renal allograft biopsy. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 1069.
25. Nadeau KC, Azuma H, Tilney NL. Cytokines in the pathophysiology of acute and chronic rejection. Transplant Rev 1996; 10: 99.
26. Wilczeck H. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the renal allograft: a clinical safety evaluation of 1129 biopsies. Transplantation 1990; 50: 790.