New approach to quantitative angiographic assessment after stent implantation

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 343-347

  Reimers, Bernhard ^a   Di Mario, Carlo ^a   Di Francesco, Lucia ^a   Moussa, Issam ^a   Blengino, Simonetta ^a   Martini, Giovanni ^a   Reiber, Johan H C ^b   Colombo, Antonio ^a,c  

^a EMO GVM Centro Cuore   (Italy)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c EMO GVM CENTRO CUORE COLUMBUS   (Italy)

Author keywords

coronary stent; quantitative coronary angiography; stent implantation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; HUMAN; STENT;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS;

EID: 0030983106     PISSN: 00986569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199704)40:4<343::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Gronenschild E, Janssen J, Tijdens F: CAAS II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 33:61-75, 1994.
2. Desmet W, De Scheerder I, Beatt K, Huehns T, Piessens J: In vivo comparison of different quantitative edge detection systems used for measuring coronary arterial diameters. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 34:72-80, 1995.
3. Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW: Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiographic systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 91:2174-2183, 1995.
4. Haase J, Escaned J, Montauban van Swijndregt E, et al: Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 30:104-114, 1993.
5. Foley JB: Alterations in reference vessel diameter following intracoronary stent implantation: Important consequences for restenosis based on percent diameter stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 35:103-109, 1995.
6. De Jaegere P, Strauss BH, Morel M-A, De Feyter PJ, Serruys PW: Critical appraisal of quantitative coronary angiography and endoluminal stent implantation. In Serruys PW, Foley DP, de Feyter P (eds): "Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 573-590.
7. Reiber JHC, van der Zwet PMJ, Koning G, von Land CD, van Meurs B, Gerbrands JJ, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE: Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography; observer - as well as short - and medium term variabilities. In Serruys PW, Foley DP, de Feyter PJ (eds): "Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 7-26.
8. van der Zwet PMJ, Reiber JHC: A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: The gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:216-224, 1994.
9. Goldberg SL, Colombo A, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Tobis JM: The benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:996-1003, 1994.
10. Reimers B, von Birgelen C, van der Giessen WJ, Serruys PW: A word of caution on optimizing stent deployment in calcified lesions: A case of coronary rupture with cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 131:192-194, 1996.
11. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, Gaglione A, Goldberg SL, Tobis JM: Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 91:1676-1688, 1995.