Selective increase in CD4-positive graft-infiltrating mononuclear cells among the infiltrates in class I disparate kidney grafts undergoing rejection

Transplantation

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 722-728

  Giangrande, Isabelle ^a,b   Yamada, Kazuhiko ^a   Arn, Scott ^a   Lorf, Thomas ^a,c   Sachs, David H ^a   LeGuern, Christian ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CD4 ANTIGEN; CD8 ANTIGEN; CYCLOSPORIN A;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL MIGRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT REJECTION; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; KIDNEY GRAFT; MONONUCLEAR CELL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

EID: 0030979957     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199703150-00019     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pescovitz MD, Thislethwaite JJR, Auchincloss JH, et al. Effect of class II antigen matching on renal allograft survival in miniature swine. J Exp Med 1984; 160: 1495.
2. Rosengard BR, Ojikutu CA, Guzetta PC, et al. Induction of specific tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine with cyclosporine. Transplantation 1992; 54: 490.
3. Rosengard BR, Kortz EO, Ojikutu CA, et al. The failure of skin grafting to break tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine despite inducing marked antidonor cellular immunity. Transplantation 1991; 52: 1044.
4. Fishbein JM, Rosengard BR, Gianello P, et al. Development of tolerance to class II-mismatched renal transplants after a short course of cyclosporine therapy in miniature swine. Transplantation 1994; 57: 1303.
5. Gianello P, Fishbein JM, Sachs DH. Tolerance to primary vascularized allografts in miniature swine. Immunol Rev 1993; 133: 19.
6. Verluis DJ, Ten Kate FJ, Wenting GJ, Weimar W. Mononuclear cells infiltrating kidney allografts in the absence of rejection: effect of conversion from cyclosporin to azathioprine therapy. Transpl Int 1988; 1: 205.
7. Kolbeck PC, Tatum PA, Sanfilippo F. Relationship among the histological pattern, intensity, and phenotypes of T cells infiltrating renal allografts. Transplantation 1984; 38: 709.
8. Hall BM. Cells mediating allograft rejection. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1141.
9. Dallman MJ, Wood KJ, Morris PJ. Specific cytotoxic T cells are found in the non-rejected kidneys of blood-transfused rats. J Exp Med 1987; 165: 566.
10. Gianello PR, Blancho G, Fishbein JF, et al. Mechanism of cyclosporin-induced tolerance to primarily vascularized allografts in miniature swine. J Immunol 1994; 153: 4788.
11. Balch CM, Wilson CB, Lee S, Feldman JD. Thymus-dependent lymphocytes in tissue sections of rejecting rat renal allografts. J Exp Med 1973; 138: 1584.
12. Strom TB, Tilney NL, Carpenter CB, Busch GJ. Identity and cytotoxic capacity of cells infiltrating renal allografts. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 1257.
13. Preffer FI, Colvin RB, Leary CP, et al. Two-color flow cytometry and functional analysis of lymphocytes cultured from human renal allografts: identification of a Leu-2+3+ subpopulation. J Immunol 1986; 137: 2823.
14. Charpentier BM, Bach MA, Lang P, Martin B, Fries D. Phenotypic composition and in vitro functional capacities of unmodified fresh cells infiltrating acutely rejected human kidney allografts. Transplantation 1987; 44: 38.
15. Ibrahim S, Dawson DV, Sanfilippo F. Predominant infiltration of rejecting human renal allografts with T cells expressing CD8 and CD45RO. Transplantation 1995; 59: 724.
16. Hall BM, Bishop GA, Farnsworth A, et al. Identification of the cellular subpopulations infiltrating rejecting cadaver renal allografts. Transplantation 1984; 37: 564.
17. Tufveson G, Forsum U, Claesson K, et al. T-lymphocyte subsets and HLA-DR-expressing cells in rejected human kidney grafts. Scand J Immunol 1983; 18: 37.
18. McWhinnie DL, Thompson JF, Taylor HM, et al. Morphometric analysis of cellular infiltration assessed by monoclonal antibody labelling in sequential human renal allograft biopsies. Transplantation 1986; 42: 352.
19. Mayer TJ, Bhan AK, Winn HJ. Immunohistochemical analysis of skin graft rejection in mice: kinetics of lymphocyte infiltration in grafts of limited immunogenetic disparity. Transplantation 1988; 46: 890.
20. Sachs DH, Leight G, Cone J, Schwartz S, Stuart L, Rosenberg S. Transplantation in the miniature swine. I. Fixation of the major histocompatibility complex. Transplantation 1976; 22: 559.
21. Kirkman RL, Colvin RB, Flye MW, Williams GM, Sachs DH. Transplantation in miniature swine. VII. Evidence for cellular immune mechanisms in hyperacute rejection of renal allografts. Transplantation 1979; 28: 24.
22. Blancho G, Gianello PR, Lorf T, et al. Molecular and cellular events implicated in local tolerance to kidney allografts in miniature swine. Transplantation 1997; 63(1): 26.
23. Pescovitz MD, Lunney JK, Sachs DH. Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive with porcine PBL. J Immunol 1984; 133: 368.
24. Rosengard BR, Fishbein JM, Gianello P, et al. Retransplantation in miniature swine: lack of the requirement for graft adaptation for maintenance of specific renal allograft tolerance. Transplantation 1994; 57: 794.
25. Bradley JA, Bolton EM. The T-cell requirement for allograft rejection. Transplant Rev 1992; 6: 115.
26. Sako H, Nakane Y, Okino K, et al. Immunohistochemical study of the cells infiltrating human renal allografts by the ABC and the IGGS method using monoclonal antibodies. Transplantation 1987; 44: 43.
27. Kirk AD, Ibrahim MA, Bolliger RR, Dawson DV, Finn OJ. Renal allograft-infiltrating lymphocytes. Transplantation 1992; 53: 329.
28. Crocker BP, Borowitz MJ. Cytotoxic T-cell allotaxis in human kidney rejection. Am J Clin Pathol 1982; 78: 707.
29. Cepek KL, Shaw SK, Parker CM, et al. Adhesion between epithelial cells and T lymphocytes mediated by E-cadherin and the alpha E beta 7 integrin. Nature 1994; 372: 190.
30. Poussier P, Julius M. Thymus independent T cell development and selection in the intestinal epithelium. Annu Rev Immunol 1994; 12: 521.
31. Mampaso F, Sanchez-Madrid F, Marcen R, et al. Expression of adhesion molecules in allograft renal dysfunction: a distinct pattern in rejection and cyclosporine nephrocytotoxicity. Transplantation 1993; 56: 687.
32. Bishop GL, Hall BM. Expression of leukocyte and lymphocyte adhesion molecules in the human kidney. Kidney Int 1989; 36: 1078.
33. - T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1990; 20: 265.
34. Kortz EO, Sakamoto K, Suzuki T, et al. Mechanism of tolerance following class I disparate renal allografts in miniature swine: cellular responses of tolerant animals. Transplantation 1990; 49: 1142.
35. Bishop DK, Chan S, Li W, Ensley RD, Xu S, Eichwald EJ. CD4-positive helper T lymphocytes mediate mouse cardiac allograft rejection independent of donor alloantigen specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Transplantation 1993; 56: 892.
36. Sachs DH, Mayer N, Ozato K. Monoclonal antibodies directed toward murine H-2 and Ia antigens. In: Hammerling GJ, Hammerling U, Kearney JF, eds. Monoclonal antibodies and T cells hybridomas, Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biochemical Press, 1981: 95.
37. Hammerberg C, Schurig G. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against swine leukocytes. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1986; 11: 107.
38. Ivanoska D, Sun DC, Lunney JK. Production of monoclonal antibodies reactive with polymorphic and monomorphic determinants of SLA class I gene products. Immunogenetics 1991; 33: 220.
39. Bailey M, Stevens K, Bland PW, Stokes CR. A monoclonal antibody recognizing an epitope associated with pig interleukin-2 receptors. J Immunol Methods 1992; 153: 85.
40. Molecular basis of T cell cytotoxicity. Immunological reviews. Vol. 146. Möller G, ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1995.