A taxonomic information model for botanical databases: The IOPI model

Taxon

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 283-309

  Berendsohn, Walter G ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030977526     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1224098     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anonymous, 1987. ITF. The international transfer tormat for botanic garden plant records. Pittsburgh.
2. _ 1990-1995. CASE/4/0 version 4.1 program and on-line documentation. Microtool GmbH. Berlin.
3. _ 1992. An information model for biological collections (draft). Report of the Biological Collections Data Standards Workshop, August 18-24, 1992. Association of Systematic Collections, Committee on Computerization and Networking. [Gopher://muse.bio.Cornell. edu:70/11/standards/asc].
4. _ 1994. Logical data model for museum collection transaction management, version 1.0. 20 Jun 1994. A project of the collections and research information system (CRIS) development program. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington. [Gopher://nmnhgoph.si.edu:70/11/.compute/.cris/.logicaldm].
5. _ 1995. Interagency taxonomy information system (ITIS), requirements and design statement, version February 28, 1995. Washington.
6. _ 1997. The species plantarum project (SPP). International Organization of Plant Information. [http://iopi.csu.edu.au/iopi/iopispp1.html].
7. Beach, J. H., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J. H. 1993. Hierarchic taxonomic databases. Pp. 241-256 in: Fortuner, R. (ed.), Advances in computer methods for systematic biology: artificial intelligence, databases, computer vision. Baltimore.
8. Berendsohn, W. G. 1993. CASE (computer aided software engineering) techniques in botanical database design. Pp. 7-11 in: Giddings, L. (ed.), Memoirs of the symposium "Management of Biological Diversity and Conservation Data", Xalapa, Veracruz, November 3-13, 1992. Xalapa.
9. _ 1994. IOPI vascular plant checklist. A case model of checklist system data, version 6.0. In: Wilson, K. 1994 (ed.), Global Plant Checklist project plan, version 1.2. International Organization for Plant Information, Sidney. See also *version 7.3. 23 Jun 1995 [http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin.de/iopi/iopimode173/7301root.htm].
10. _ 1994. IOPI vascular plant checklist. A case model of checklist system data, version 6.0. In: Wilson, K. 1994 (ed.), Global Plant Checklist project plan, version 1.2. International Organization for Plant Information, Sidney. See also *version 7.3. 23 Jun 1995 [http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin.de/iopi/iopimode173/7301root.htm].
11. _ 1995. The concept of "potential taxa" in databases. Taxon 44: 207-212.
12. _ , Anagnostopoulos, A., Jakupovic, J., Nimis, P. L. & Valdés, B. 1997a. A framework for biological information models. Lagascalia 19: 667-672.
13. _ , _ , Hagedorn, G., Jakupovic, J., Nimis, P. L. & Valdés, B. 1997b. The CDEFD information model for biological collections. In: Los, W. (ed.), Proceedings of the European Science Foundation workshop "Disseminating Biodiversity Information", Amsterdam, 25.-27. 3. 1996. (in press). See also *on-line version [http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin. de/CDEFD/CollectionModel/cdeFd.htm].
14. _ , Greilhuber, J., Anagnostopoulos, A., Bedini, G., Jakupovic, J., Nimis, P. L. & Valdés, B. 1997c. A comprehensive data model for karyological databases. Pl. Syst. Evol. (in press).
15. Bisby, F. 1994a. Global plant checklist data definitions, version 5.2. In: Wilson, K. 1994 (ed.), Global plant checklist project plan, version 1.2. International Organization for Plant Information, Sidney.
16. _ 1994b. Plant names in botanical databases. Plant Taxonomic Database Standards No. 3. Pittburgh
17. Blum, S. D. 1996. The MVZ collections information model. Conceptual and logical models. University of California at Berkeley, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. [http://www.mip. berkeley.edu/mvz/cis.html].
18. Bolton, M. P., Busby, J. R. & Callahan, S. 1992. Core attributes for terrestrial biological survey data in Australia, version 3. Environmental Resources Information Network, Canberra.
19. Bridson, G. D. R. & Smith, E. R. 1991. B-P-H/S Botanico-periodicum-huntianum/supplementum. Pittsburgh.
20. Brummitt, R. K. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Kew.
21. _ & Powell, C. E. (ed.), 1992. Authors of plant names. Kew.
22. Coad, E. & Yourdon, E. 1991. Object-oriented analysis, ed. 2. Englewood Cliffs.
23. Conn, B. J. (ed.), 1996. HISPID3. Herbarium information standards and protocols for interchange of data HISPID, version 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney.
24. Croft, J. R. (ed.), 1989. HISPID - Herbarium information standards and protocols for interchange of data, version 1. Canberra.
25. Elankovan, S., Berendsohn, W. G. & Meyer, H. 1997. Person teams in the CDEFD and IOPI models: an implementation. In: Los, W. (ed.), Proceedings of the European Science Foundation workshop "Disseminating Biodiversity Information", Amsterdam, 25.-27.3.1996. (in press). See also *on-line version [http://www.bgbm.fu-berlin. de/CDEFD/PersonTeams/Title.htm] undated.
26. Greuter, W., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Chaloner, W. G., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Jørgensen, P. M., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Trehane, P. & McNeill, J. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature (Tokyo Code) adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, August-September 1993. Regnum Veg. 131.
27. _ , Hawksworth, D. L., McNeill, J., Mayo, M. A., Tindall, B. J., Trehane, P. & Tubbs, P. 1996. Draft BioCode: the prospective international rules for the scientific names of organisms. Third draft, revised at a meeting of the Committee at Egham, U.K., 8-10 March 1996. Taxon 45: 349-372. *See also: [http://www.rom.on.ca/ebuff/biocode.htm].
28. Halliday, P., Meikle, R. D., Story, J. & Wilkinson, H. 1980. Draft index of author abbreviations. Kew.
29. Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & Brandenburg, W. A. 1995 Culton versus taxon: conceptual issues in cultivated plant systematics. Taxon 44: 161-175.
30. Homby, A. S. 1974. Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current english. Oxford.
31. Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. New York.
32. _ , Buchheim, A. F. G., Daniels, G. S. & Dolezal, H. 1968. B-P-H. Botanico-periodicumhuntianum. Pittsburgh.
33. Lindberg, D. & al. 1996. Data model for paleontological collection. University of California Museum of Paleontology. [http://www.ucmp.Berkeley.Edu/museum/datamodel/datamodel.html].
34. Murray, R. G. E. & Schleifer, K. H. 1994. Taxonomic notes: a proposal for recording the properties of putative taxa of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44: 174-176.
35. _ & Stackebrandt, E. 1995. Taxonomic note: implementation of the provisional status Candidatus incompletely described prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 186-187.
36. Sinnot, Q. 1993. Germplasm resources information network (GRIN) taxonomic prototype. Grin 3 schema draft. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville.
37. Stafleu, F. A. & Cowan, R. S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature, ed. 2. Regnum Veg. 94, 98, 105, 110, 112, 115, 116.
38. _ & Mennega, E. A. 1992-1995. Taxonomic literature, ed. 2, Suppl. 1-3. Regnum Veg. 125, 130, 132.
39. Trehane, P., Brickell, C. D., Baum, B. R., Hetterscheid, W. L. A., Leslie, A. C. Spongberg, S. A., Vrugtman, F. & McNeill, J. 1995. International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants - 1995. Regnum Veg. 133.
40. Wilson, K. 1994. Global plant checklist project plan, version 1.2. International Organization for Plant Information (IOPI), Sidney.
41. Wilson, P. D. 1993. Missouri Botanical Garden research data model. Prepared for the Research and Steering Committee. Release 4.0. Missouri Botanical Garden. [Gopher://cissus. mobot.org:70/11/pub].
42. Zhong, Y., Jung, S., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J. H. 1996. Data model and comparison and query methods for interacting classifications in a taxonomic database. Taxon 45: 223-241.