The functional response of copepodid stages to adult of Parabroteas sarsi (Copepoda, Calanoida)

Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 95-105

  Vega, Marina Patricia A ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

copepod; functional response; predation; prey size; Zooplankton

Indexed keywords

CALANOIDA; COPEPODA; PARABROTEAS; PARABROTEAS SARSI;

EID: 0030976273     PISSN: 00209309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19970820112     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BALSEIRO, E. G. and L. A. FERNANDEZ, 1992: La relation depredador-prcsa entre larvas de Tropistemus setiger (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) y Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): efectos del tamano del depredador y de la presa Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 51: 79-85.
2. BALSEIRO, E. G. and M. A. P. VEGA, 1994: Vulnerability of Daphnia middendorffiana to Parabroteas sarsi prédation: the role of the tail spine J. Plankton Res. 7: 783-793.
3. BOTTRELL, H. H., A. DUNCAN, Z. M. Gttwicz, E. GRYGIEREK, A. HERZIG, A. HILLBRICHT, I. ILKOWSKA, H. KURASAWA, P. LARSON and T. WEGLENSKA, 1976: A review of some problems in Zooplankton studies Nor. J. Zool. 24419-456.
4. BUTLER, M. I. and C. W. BURNS, 1993: Watermite prédation on planktonic cladocera: parallel curve analysis of functional responses Oikos 66: 5-16.
5. DODSON, S. I., 1984: Prédation of Heterocope septentrionalis on two species of Daphnia: Morphological defenses and their cost Ecology 65: 1249-1257.
6. GILBERT, J. J. and C. E. WILLIAMSON, 1983: Sexual dimorphism in Zooplankton (Copepoda, Cladocera and Rotifera) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 1-33.
7. GLIWICZ, Z. M. and J. PIJANOWSKA, 1989: The role of prédation in Zooplankton succesion In: SOMMER, U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 253-296.
8. HALL, D. S., S. TIIRELKELD, C. BURNS and P. CROWLERY, 1976: The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of Zooplankton communities Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 177-208.
9. HASSELL, M. P., J. H. LAWTON and J. R. BEDDINGTON, 1977: Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 249-262.
10. HASSELL, M., 1978: The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princenton, New Jersey.
11. HEYWOOD, R. B., 1970: The mouthparts and feeding habits of Parabroteas sarsi (üADAY) and Pseudoboeckella silvestri DADAY (Copepoda, Calanoida) In: M. W. HOLDGATE (ed.), Antarctic Ecology, London, England: 639-650.
12. HOLLING, C., 1966: The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 48: 1-86.
13. JAMIESON, C., 1980: The predatory feeding of copepodid stages III to adult Mesocyclops leuckarti CLAUS In: KERFOOT, W. C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Community, Hannover: 518-537.
14. JOHANSSON, F., 1992: Predator life style and prey mobility: a comparison of two predatory odonate larvae Arch. Hydrobiol. 126: 163-173.
15. LIPCIUS, R. N. and A. H. HINES, 1986: Variable functional responses of a marine predator in dissimilar homogeneous microhabitats Ecology 67: 1361-2371.
16. MAIER, G., 1990: Coexistence of the predatory cyclopoids Acanthocyclops robiistns (SARS) and Mesocyclops leuckarti (CLAUS) in a small eutrophic lake Hydrobiologia 198: 185-203.
17. PAGGI, S. J. and J. C. PAGGI, 1985: Zooplancton de los cuerpos de agua preexistentes en el area del Embalse Amutui Quimei (Cuenca del Rio Futaleufiî) Neotropica 31: 119-131.
18. PIJANOWSKA, J., 1990: Cyclomorphosis in Daphina, an adaptation to avoid invertebrate prédation. Hydrobiologia 198: 41-50.
19. PIZZOLON, L., N. SANTINELLI, M. C. MARINOXE and C. A. MENUMARQUE, 1995: Plankton and hydrochemistry of Lake Futulaufquen (Patagonia, Argentina) during the growing season Hydrobiologia 316: 63-73.
20. SIN, A., 1987: Predators and Prey Lifestyles: An Evolutionary and Ecological Overview In: KERFOOT, W. C. and Sin, A. (eds.), Prédation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH, pp. 203-224.
21. THOMPSON, D. J., 1975: Towards a predator-prey model incorporating age structure: The effect of predator and prey size on prédation of Daphnia magna by Ishnura elegans J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 907-916.
22. VEGA, M. A. P., 1995: Morphology and defensive structures in the predator-prey interaction: an experimental study of Parabroteas sarsi (Copepoda, Calanoida) with different cladoceran prey Hydrobiologia 299: 139-145.
23. WILLIAMSON, C. E., 1984: Laboratory and field experiments on the feeding ecology of the freshwater cyclopoid copepod, Mesocyclops edax Freshwater Biology 14: 575-585.
24. WONG, C. K. and \V. G. SPRULES, 1985: Size-selective feeding by the predatory copepod Epischura lacusiris FORBES Can. J. Aquat. Sei. 42: 189-193.
25. YEN, J., 1985: Selective prédation by the carnivorous marine copepod Euchaeta eloiigata: Laboratory measurements of prédation rates verified by field observations of temporal and spatial feeding patterns Limnol. Oceanog. 30: 577-597.
26. YEN, J., 1991: Predatory feeding behavior of an antarctic marine copepod, Eucliaeta antarctica Pro Mare Symposium on Polar Marine Ecology, p. 433142.
27. ZARET, T., 1978: A prédation model of Zooplankton community structure Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 20: 2496-2500.